This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The 2022 Wypipo Awards
Yes, that's an actual headline at Yahoo News, published just a week ago. It's basically a long anti-white rant by a bigoted ethnic activist. I am fascinated that white Americans are so sissified in the face of this open bigotry. In many ways, their patience is Christ-like. I for one don't hope for a tit-for-tat development, because this world needs less tribalism and conflict. But as long as anti-white racism isn't called out, I can't take people who claim to be anti-racists seriously. And the editors at Yahoo news allowing this vile rant to be published shows that its ingrained in US culture.
If White Americans are Christ-Like in the face of the slings and arrows of outrageous (checks notes) Yahoo News articles...it's more Craig Christ than his brother Jesus. I'm sure everyone has seen most of this online dating data before, along with the income data, prison odds, marriage patterns, as long as you aren't poor or stupid or both {in which case there's a good chance I don't really care anyway} being white is awesome in America.
I get irrationally annoyed at white male grievance studies types who have fully internalized the minority narrative of oppression and try to apply it themselves. There is a substantive difference between my wife slapping me and me slapping my wife. The relative strength and power of the two actors changes the meaning. To pretend it doesn't is a sign that one simply doesn't understand the burdens of patriarchy, that one is substantively unprepared to be a paterfamilias. One who is so sissified that he must constantly bark his head off at every perceived slight isn't an alpha, he's a chihuahua who needs to prove how threatening he is.
To be young and smart and white and male in America is perhaps not to be born on second base and think you hit a double, but it is certainly coming into your at-bat with a 2-0 count and a runner in scoring position. If you can't convert, it's on you.
Have you actually tried to threaten an alpha? I don't think that's how actual alphas in hierarchical animal societies behave. I think if a lower ranking animal gets bold enough to challenge an alpha, there would be a fight. Or at least show of dominance that ensures the alpha is still an alpha.
I mean we as humans do not have to follow animalistic patterns, but if you bring that in - I don't think "true alpha is so secure in their power you can spit on him all day and he'd just smile" actually how it works. The point of chihuahua barking is to look threatening, yes. The point of Cane Corso not barking it already looks fucking terrifying. If you're sissified, you're not looking fucking terrifying. I don't think anybody can seriously claim that people in the US right now live in terror of white patriarchy. They certainly don't behave like it. I don't say they should be - but if it's not happening, you can not pretend it is and bring it as an argument.
I think the disconnect between us, in this comment, is that you view the article above as "being spit all over" and I view it as more like "absolutely nothing, done by an absolute nobody, I don't care about any of this." You, and other commenters, appear to perceive your life as being spit all over. I perceive my life, based on those same demographic characteristics, as more like this than it is like being spit all over.
When I walk my dog down the back road, the chihuahua barks its head off whenever it sees another dog, because the existence of another dog is a threat to him. If a fight breaks out, he's dead, my dog will shake him until his little neck breaks, it'll be over before I get ten words out. When we run into the St. Bernard or the pit bull, they don't give a shit about us, we're either friends or we're beneath notice.
My dog is somewhere in between, she's kinda big but she's a real asshole, less tracking to size and strength than to deep emotional problems I failed to work out of her after adoption, but now we're really getting off track of the metaphor.
The problem is not a single article. By itself it is indeed nothing. The problem is what gave raise to this article and what made it possible and normal and in some circles, laudable. Because it also made it possible to have racial quotas, people being fired for being of a wrong race, people being hired solely for being of a right race, mandatory racist trainings, "professors" calling whole races criminals and calling for their elimination, and, ultimately, people hearing those calls.
You seem to think it's all nothing, mere noise, because The Patriarchy is strong and never changes and since every white person is a member, there's nothing for any of them to worry about, however much hate and abuse is directed towards them. I think the situation is a bit different. Something like The Patriarchy does exist, but I am not a member and you are likely not a member either, and most people who are being called "white" aren't a members (tbh, most people that aren't being called "white" also aren't). And it absolutely does not care what you look like, if you're not a member - but willing to use how you look like to keep you under control, and if needed - to destroy you. And when people like the author of that article think by writing something like that they fight The Patriarchy, the do exactly the opposite - they spread the Approved Narrative because that's what was deemed useful. And if you happen to be fired, or denied opportunities, or not promoted, or plain old beaten up due to this narrative - it's all on you, because that's what the Narrative says.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link