This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is the worst analogy I have read on the net all week.
First, we have a rabies vaccine. In the real world, inoculating the healthy (and just-infected) would be our main weapon against super-rabies, rather than gunning down the diseased.
Second, memes are importantly different from viruses. Memes are easily transmitted through time and space. However, they are also unlikely to infect 100% of the people exposed to them. They also do not kill their hosts, generally. While they can dominate virtually unchanged for thousands of years, they tend to last much shorter in periods of rapid technological progress. So a meme becoming dominant is not the end of the world.
Third, killing the carriers is not very effective to combat memes. The carriers of Christianity were regularly murdered in ancient Rome, and yet this did not prevent the spreading. I will grant you that communist memes did very badly in Nazi Germany, so you might say that Nero's failure to root out Christianity was simply a skill issue. Personally, I dislike societies which murder fractions of their population.
Fourth, why would social justice progressivism be a uniquely dangerous meme complex? Western civilization has survived the spread of Christianity, enlightenment, atheism, communism, fascism, liberalism, hippies, punks, enviromentalism and so on. Granted, some of these meme complexes were really bad and killed a lot of people in the name of stopping competing memes or for other reasons.
Personally, while I intensely dislike SJP, I also do not consider it as dangerous a communism was in its time. I also like liberalism a lot. Any society where you just shoot the carriers of a hostile meme is very illiberal. Typically, it will target not only the carriers of one hostile meme complex, but the carriers of all meme complexes perceived hostile. I also think that SJP is already over its zenith. In 2010, it was the hot new thing for youth looking to rebel against the establishment. Eventually, the kind of older women who would have reported young people who received visits from opposed-gender people to their landlords in the 1950s will be the main enforcers of SJ norms, and that will paint these norms as 'cringe'.
TL;DR: The battlefield to defeat SJP is the marketplace of ideas.
Tell me, why are we here, and not on Reddit?
Reddit is a big corporate-owned platform. The motte is freedom of speech maximalist. These two things do not generally mix.
When the exodus from reddit happened, the SJP were the most influential tribe with reddit, so they lead the charge. But if it had not been them, it would have been some other tribe instead. I wish I could say that SJ is the only ideology which ever engaged in anti-competitive behavior in the marketplace of ideas, but instead it seems almost universal. Free speech is a great idea while you are the underdog and get oppressed for speaking the truth, but once you are in charge it suddenly seems much more important to prevent your enemies from spreading their vile poison.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
This has already happened; traditional Christianity (or at least, people who claimed to be them) was this for that age group up until the mid-00s until it was clear to the average participant it was naturally dying out as a morally-respected force.
More options
Context Copy link
We tried. SJP played dirty by sending goons into the marketplace and attacking opponents outside it. Fighting it only on that battlefield is a losing battle.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link