site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 1, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Does anyone know how to get confirmation / denial from the police or prosecutors as a random nobody from another country? We might be getting a update on the Braveheart incident.

Highly sophisticated Twitter anons are now claiming that Fatos Ali Dumana has been charged with assaulting a minor:

  • Police Scotland originally claimed that CCTV footage went missing but it proved that only Lola Moir had committed a crime by being in possession of dangerous weapons
  • It is now claimed that this is a lie and there is proof that Police Scotland attempted to cover up the crime of Fatos and his sister assaulting the little girls
  • Attached is the screenshot of the hospital record proving that Ruby Moir sustained a serious head injury (concussion) as a result of the assault by Fatos Ali Dumana and his sister

Now, this isn't new information per se, as @FistfullOfCrows pointed out "it has been alleged". I can't find the link to where I first saw the allegation, but I've seen it, and remained skeptical thinking "shouldn't there be a medical report"? Lo, and behold, there seems to be one attached to the above tweet.

Ok, it's still trivial to fake something like this, it would be nice to get some sort of confirmation from a disinterested source.... oh, look (Turn off javascript to read. I tried archiving it, but they seem to have countermeasures) a local newspaper is saying that """Two further people""", """a man and a woman""", have been charged as a result of the incident. No names are named (funny how you can dox a little girl, but somehow adults are a step to far), so who knows, maybe it's the girl's parents that are being charged, but with all the other irregularities around the incident, and the newspaper's cageyness around the names of the suspects I wouldn't bet on it.

So... does anyone know how to go about confirming / denying this? @self_made_human, you're in Scotland, would you be willing to make some phone calls?

EDIT:

One piece of evidence I haven't seen anyone else post is this 20-minute-long pair of videos in which a young teenage girl, claiming (in my opinion, beyond any reasonable doubt; there is some supporting evidence) to be Lola and Ruby's friend Mayah, gives her side of the story. To summarize:

  • The girls were on their way to meet some friends
  • They passed Dumana, who was with a male friend at the time
  • He called Lola "sexy"
  • The girls began to shout at him, saying "Go away, she's 12"; he was undeterred and kept calling her sexy
  • Mayah "dragged both girls away", hoping to diffuse the situation
  • Dumana started to follow them (he had initially been walking in the other direction)
  • The girls noticed and began shouting, "Why are you following us/Stop following us"/etc.
  • Another man heard the commotion and asked the girls if they knew Dumana and his friend
  • The man got up in Dumana's face; Dumana pushed him; he backed down; Dumana kept following as the girls shouted at him
  • Dumana started to speak on the phone in a foreign language
  • As Ruby was texting a friend, Dumana's sister came "flying around the corner" and attacked her from behind, with Dumana joining in ("punching and kicking her head")
  • Mayah stepped away to call the police
  • Lola surprised everyone by revealing she had weapons tucked under her waistband, to Mayah's disapproval (incidentally this contradicts the reading of "retrieve" in the GiveSendGo telling of the events that would have Lola running home in the middle of the confrontation)
  • Dumana started to film
  • Shortly after the end of the video, Lola fled the scene, to Mayah's disapproval

Condensing the rest for brevity:

  • The police arrived quickly; some of them went off to find Lola and brought her back
  • Mayah accompanied Ruby to the hospital
  • (From what I gather, Mayah heard that) Dumana resisted as the police attempted to force him into a police car next to Lola's, by punching and kicking them, spitting on them repeatedly (so that they had to put a spit hood on him), and urinating in the car
  • The last few minutes of the video are spent requesting that people please stop associating her name with Lola's face and actions, and pooh-poohing Lola for carrying weapons

So, that's the "she said". It's also worth noting that several times in the video, Mayah, with apparent contrition, "admits" to the girls possibly having exacerbated the situation with all their shouting. She also emphasizes that their belligerence was due to the outrageousness of Dumana's behavior and had nothing to do with race.

It's unclear what triggered the escalation to physical violence or by what dream logic Dumana's friend transformed into his sister. Still, I'm pretty confident that however much the girls might have raised the temperature of the situation, anyone in possession of all the facts would overwhelmingly blame Dumana and his party for what happened. As I already did before looking into it at all, based on what I believe to be better-calibrated priors than many people in this thread have.

(I speculate that some posters are trying to signal that their ability to noootice doesn't stop at race, that they're not to be confused with Uncle Roy. "Ruby's a hooker name, dude! Don't you know just how violent CHAV girls are?" "No, do you?" "No." This causes them to make epistemic mistakes that they wouldn't ordinarily make, like trusting the media and police's early reporting not to misleadingly downplay something a brown migrant did to a young girl, which we already know they did to some extent.)

I'm also open to bets.

It's unclear what triggered the escalation to physical violence or by what dream logic Dumana's friend transformed into his sister.

I thought the person accompanying him, be it his wife, sister, or friend, was a woman? The local media articles about the additional arrests talk about "a man and a woman". Though it would be a whole 'nother level to start calling 12 year olds "sexy" in front of your wife or sister, I suppose.

The girl in the video is adamant that he was accompanied by a male at first, and that the sister only showed up later on.