This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It's a bit more subtle than that. It's probably easier to say they dominate every field that's currently dominant. Tech is lousy with them and tech rules everything right now, but even the top end of tech is more gray tribe (and occasionally quite furry) than blue. Everything downstream of academia is theirs, but academia is currently cratering.
Energy and logistics tend to be quite red, and have always been important.
Those data centers would melt in a week or so of this scenario…
More options
Context Copy link
[citation needed]
You also forget pretty much the entire Federal bureaucracy, the commanding heights of the economy (like Larry Fink with ESG, and all the other "woke capital"), the upper ranks of the military, the topmost people in most law enforcement (and the rank-and-file, however Red, will follow whatever orders their Blue bosses give, because "I've got to think about my pension").
Same with "energy and logistics." The rank-and-file grunts might be Red Tribe, but their bosses are Blue, and Red Tribe people obey hierarchy. Plus, trying to "weaponize" those requires organization, and we Reds don't do that. We're proud of not doing organization. We are "the people who, if someone orders us to breathe, suffocate to death." I've heard some say that that anyone who talks of "organizing" is the Enemy, and that if someone shows up at his door with such talk, it doesn't matter if they've been friends for decades, he's shooting them dead on the spot.
I don't think any energy and logistics bosses I know of are openly Blue. Maybe performatively Blue. An increasing majority of them are also non-American or Indian, and those often don't map quickly onto the American Red/Blue tribe political axes.
I think the tribal nature of it comes down to tendencies on a personal level; Blue tribe is dominated by those who wish the world changed for the better/to suit them better. As the world changes for the worse, those who switch to a preservation mentality become ascendant. I don't think it's a coincidence that the fields of energy and logistics are relatively mature and lean Red, they know the difficulty in trying to maintain what already exists instead of trying to tear it all down and build something new.
And again, as mentioned, tech is lousy with Blue because tech tends to be full of people who want to change things. "Move fast and break things" is fundamentally a blue activity even if they do it for reasons other than the liberal project.
More options
Context Copy link
The number of college-age Americans is going to start decreasing the next couple of years. If the US restricts the number of foreign college students, colleges are going to have to compete for these students and the bottom 5-10% will shut down. The schools that do not want to shut down will have to start being more attractive to these students and their parents. Meanwhile, conservatives are much more likely to have children than those on the far left. The combination could contribute to a pressure to at least reign in the more luxury beliefs universities have cultivated.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
They successfully forced the gray tribe in big tech to convert or submit a decade ago.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link