site banner
PaperclipPerfector  7d ago (text post)   24217 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 20, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even the most attractive woman on earth doesn't come with a literal motor in her pussy.

It took me a long time, but I eventually realized that the feminists were right all along. Sex (for men) isn’t about sex, it’s about power.

The motorized pussy might feel good. But you’ll know that you didn’t make another soul submit to you.

Might be true for you, certainly there's enough erotic content in that vein, but a lot of people are mere animals in this, and a lot of other people treasure the connection and pleasure someone else appears to obtain from the coupling.

but a lot of people are mere animals in this

We call those people 'men'. (Being more animalistic means you can afford a higher-quality mate in primitive circumstances.)

and a lot of other people treasure the connection and pleasure someone else appears to obtain from the coupling

We call those people 'women'. (Being better at this means you can demand a higher-quality mate in primitive circumstances[0].)

Some people are trans to varying degrees (women seeking sex as end, men actively seeking woman's pleasure), and trans is very over-represented in popular media and on the internet (and among certain subcultures, especially classical liberal ones- the Sexual Revolution was trans pride in this sense, and you kind of have to be trans to be classically liberal anyway re: Haidt's Moral Foundations[1] so the two go hand in hand) even without active attempts at banning traditional thought for outer party middle class members. (Even 1984 didn't go that far.)

I think the people who are not trans are far more prevalent than we think, especially if we note it's a fallback mode; I think the people who are not trans are more likely to be the people doing physical work (and women have other options than 'trying to opt-out of environments of physical labor in which you would not be competitive as fast as humanly possible', which is abnormal with respect to human evolution).

And I get that we want to try to erase that past (for various reasons- a lot of it has to do with the generation in power taking the end of that extremely personally re: feminism) because muh End of History, but we function this way for a reason. You can't be beyond male and female without understanding what a man or woman is.

[0] And by "primitive circumstances" I mean the ancestral environment where the typical family's caloric intake is directly linked to male physical labor [or warfare] (and female childbirth, for laborer or soldier). In practice, this means any society of behaviorally-modern humans that didn't keep slaves and wasn't mechanized.

[1] Progressives are all just conservatives, morally speaking; this is a Boomer blind spot. The liberal-as-in-freedom people are the actual mutants.

This is too much of a galaxy brain take, to believe men who don't instinctively consider women during sex to be mere masturbation aids.

Or that 'being animalistic ' helps in intragroup competition..even among unorganized savages the successful leaders were some combination of aggressive and charismatic.

Sex (for men) isn’t about sex, it’s about power. The motorized pussy might feel good. But you’ll know that you didn’t make another soul submit to you.

That isn't true, and your analysis of why someone might find that experience hollow misses the mark. Men don't want a mechanical vagina because they are not just sex machines and have a desire to be loved. You can pay a prostitute or buy a female simulacrum, but neither will ever love you and the experience will be hollow as a result.

The feminists weren't right and Oscar Wilde only said the things he said because saying them made him sound clever.

I think a better model is that women find power desirable while conversely men find desire powerful.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats