This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Just look to the cochlear implant micro culture war for a template of how things would go.
I was just thinking of that too.
The real big deal is if you can apply it in-vitro for surrogate mothers carrying the children of gay couples. Ethical crossovers with things like screening for Downs Syndrome and the like?
"I want my kids to be like me. There is nothing wrong with being gay."
We could perhaps generalize this further to the question of whether it's worthwhile to preserve distinct or minority cultures when their own members would abandon them given the choice. Whether it is in ethnicity, languages, culinary traditions, or clothing (basically everything except for sexual orientation), we see a very strong trend towards homogenization, while at the same time the argument is made that diversity in these things is needed as a sort of insurance in case some fatal memetic weakness of our collective monoculture is exposed one day. Do we let the market decide which traditions, lifestyles, and cultures survive or do we need to tip the scales in some way e.g. some form of segregation, putting resources into revitalization efforts, or at the most extreme end the sort of medical intervention outlined above?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link