site banner
PaperclipPerfector  3d ago (text post)   14443 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 15, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes. RIP.

On a different note I’d argue that this was probably not politically motivated on grounds that people generally comprehend that women, especially young and pretty ones, make very poor targets of publicized political assassinations from a PR perspective.

My read on that is that - if it was in fact an activist, and based off the person of interest's physical profile as a fat schlub who walks funny - we shouldn't necessarily assume some cold-blooded, calculating assassin. Think about spiteful mutant theory, and why Eliot Roger wanted to kill blonde sorority girls.

On a different note I’d argue that this was probably not politically motivated on grounds that people generally comprehend that women, especially young and pretty ones, make very poor targets of publicized political assassinations from a PR perspective.

Anyway, if this was a targeted killing I think it's more likely that it was over romantic/sexual rejection than something political.

‘People generally comprehend’ /= ‘people who kill people comprehend’.

Has there ever been a politically motivated assassination of a young pretty white woman in the US?

Sharon Tate?

I'd argue he was trying to have a political aim even if it was a crazy mirror version of politics.

I don't know enough about the whole affair to comment on that.

Tate wasn't specifically targeted, though; they just wanted to kill the people in the house.

There's also reason to think the Helter Skelter scenario wasn't what actually happened. Maybe I should do an effort/schizo post on the Manson murders sometime.

Are you referring to the theory that the Manson family were actually hired assassins?

The Official Account (Bugliosi) is that Manson was trying to trigger a race war.

The full schizo account is that he was a subject of MKULTRA and CHAOS, and the CIA nurtured him to discredit the hippie/anti-war movement.

What's interesting is that if you dig into his time in San Francisco, you do find some pretty weird stuff related to his parole officer (a grad student at Berkeley, studying drugs and collective violence, who had a single parolee he was supervising and who managed to keep Manson out of prison for violations as diverse as grand theft, drug dealing, and rape) and the clinic Manson and his followers went to.

In all likelihood, Manson wasn't some kind of intentional project, but a series of irresponsible fuck ups by government. And his killings weren't an attempt to start a race war, but some combination of an attempt to distract from a prior crime and a drug deal gone bad.

The theory was that Manson was convinced that the US was on the verge of a race war that the blacks would win, but they wouldn't be able to effectively govern afterwards and would look to him as the new leader of America. The murders were a way of initiating the race war because the police would blame them on blacks and racial tension would ensue, both from whites who were outraged and blacks who were falsely accused. That's at least the theory that Bugliosi ran with to get a conviction.

Please do the effort post.

Young women are very underrepresented among politically relevant targets and the US doesn’t have a lot of political assassinations, so that doesn’t mean much even if there hasn’t been.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats