This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is silly. Nazis borrowed heavily from American Eugencists and FDR borrowed heavily from Mussolini. Modern leftism derives a lot of its roots and ideas from 1920s American Progressives, 1920s Eugenicists, Facists, and the USSR Communists. One of their most major arguments with Fascism, for instance, is its aesthetics (see the newest, or one of the newer Ezra Klein podcasts where he and his "fascism expert" guest malign how fascists deride fat people and ugly art/architecture). I'd agree with the idea that there is a very fine line between a modern progressive and a person who thinks we should re-start mass sterilization, and most of that fine line is IQ denialism.
Other types of ideology can weather the storm. The anti-slavery folks of the 1850s didn't think blacks were equal in talent to whites, they derived their views in other ways. So could the modern Christian conservative.
Judging by urban TFR, mass sterilization has been ongoing in progressive areas (and progressive countries more broadly) for quite some time now.
They prefer the imported humans over the domestic ones- once the economic opportunity per capita to support a middle class vanishes, the limited number of spaces at the top means they can simply staff them all with IQ denialists, and the low-IQ will keep the people who would have been the middle in line.
This is European domestic policy in a nutshell.
Of course- they had "alternate ways of knowing" and "it's just not Heckin' Nice", which is part of how modern progressives delude themselves into the pretense that they're still the anti-slavery faction (while doing literally everything they can to impose it, like importing an underclass that is indistinguishable from a slave class in the way the population is permitted to treat them, then pushing the costs of that onto the people who now have to compete with those slaves by giving them benefits reserved for citizens).
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link