site banner
PaperclipPerfector  2d ago (text post)   10832 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 26, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

2
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Any uniform that codes “strength” and “beauty” will increase the ire of the protesters. Instead, they should enrobe in the sacred insignia of the protesters’ own culture, the pride flag colors. The media will have a difficult time propagating imagery from events because it will necessarily harm their own cause by associating the most unique in-group “cues” with aversive stimuli. ICE needs to employ a cadre of beautiful black women, not unlike Gaddafi’s Amazonian Guard, all draped in rainbow flag drip, all holding large images of Gavin Newsom and playing loud audio recordings of Newsom’s voice. The moment they step out of the rainbow-colored van to announce “this is white racism” and “a black woman is speaking” is the moment President Trump unleashes the trve discombobulator technology upon the world. Photographers will be paired with each unit to take photographs of any protester who dares assault a black woman.

You've suggested something along those lines a few times now and I can't tell whether you're serious. This sounds like something that would never work except on literal cavemen.

This sounds like something that would never work except on literal cavemen.

Literal cavemen had survival instincts and invented tools. Don't insult them by association with modern protestors.

Also just think of the rationalizations for why suddenly the rainbow flag (ooo has to be the updated version) is bad. Thinkpiece writers would melt under such heat.

I’m half-serious and half-joking. This is how most people have their implicit attitudes changed IMO and there’s research to back it up. The reason you can hold a picture of Stalin and say you’re a Stalinist to normal person in America, and they will just laugh at you, whereas if you do the same with Hitler they will have an immediate negative reaction, isn’t because of some reasoning or knowledge on their behalf, but because only of these stimuli has been consistently conditioned to produce terror and other aversive responses (cf my first link). I think this was largely behind the anti-police shift of 2015-2021, as there was very little reasoned logic for their aversion, but very much a conditioned logic for their behavior. Tens of thousands chanting ACAB and putting it in their bio because the conditioning machine media would incessantly pair “police CS” to “aversion US” hundreds of times, thousands of times perhaps on social media, whereas studies show that you only need a few dozen for a noticeable increase in aversion? I’d prefer if we go back to 19th century Lincoln-Douglas discourse culture and minimize propaganda as much as possible, but until then you have to reply to it in kind. (Factual discourse is where? Here? Maybe a couple subreddits? Destiny livestreams, barely? Some elite university dining halls? The future is miserable)

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats