site banner

Small-Scale Question Sunday for February 8, 2026

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

1
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

One of the minor weekly dramas in my corner of X, the everything app, had to do with this tweet by Flesh Simulator, where he states that

"if there was a “magically become a girl” button, a solid 25% of men would probably press it. Of that 25%, 95% of them are basically still fine with living as a man and don’t experience any noticeable gender dysphoria even though they would press the button immediately. The issue with “egg cracking” and convincing people to transition is that, because of the nature of transitioning, that 5% dysphoria rate turns into effectively 100%"

(Flesh Simultor is a somewhat popular youtuber who specializes in talking about existing conspiracy theories and seems to be one of the few actually heterodox leftists, combining stuff like rabid support for socialized healthcare and the Palestinian cause with reluctant support for ICE even after the MN shootings, but that is not directly relevant to the current micro-drama)

In response he got hundreds of quote tweets and replies from people who called the 25% estimate comically unrealistic, mixed with MTF-run accounts suggesting that he is a "repressor" (someone who, in trans slang, feels gender dysphoria, but chooses not to transition due to various fears) because, again, no way a normal cis man would think that 25% of fellow men would press the "magically change one's sex" button. That seemingly caused FleshSim to backpedal a bit, stating that his estimate assumed that the button could be used to change your sex back, but my impression is that the original tweet was supposed to mean a one-way ticket to womanhood.

I was very surprised by that reaction to the tweet, because I'd give around the same estimate. My impression always was that if a "magically change biological sex" button was on the menu, the world, or at least the developed parts of it, would be at a 35:65 M:F split within a year or so. Basically, the real world would turn into what you see in most MMOs – almost all women would stay women, but a significant minority of men would choose to become women as well.

Now, I'm far from unbiased here, given that, I, for one, would absolutely press such a button. While I have no plans of transitioning IRL and belong to the 95% that are "still fine" living as the sex I was born as, my post history has me admitting to being a weeby sperg who does not feel much of a connection to his IRL body and physical reality and spends most of my time on the computer, so me choosing to press the button is probably not exactly surprising. But still, I just fail to see FleshSim's 25% conjecture as particularly outlandish. Surely, the quote tweets are all just signalling, and the share of people who'd press the button's gotta be at least in the double-digits, right?

So I ask you, minds of The Motte, what's your best guess about the percentages of men and women that would press the magical "change biological sex" button (for the purposes of the experiment, the button, due to being magical, also solves minor accompanying issues such as getting the new legal name on documents, etc.) if it was freely available?

Not sure about percentages, but the Transgender Social Ecosystem (TSE) offers a lot of social reinforcement to transitioners, especially to the alienated “weeby sperg” (your characterization). By clicking the transition button, you receive: a peer group that believes you are innately valuable and beautiful; a peer group that will talk affectionately and supportively about your body; an in-group that makes you feel as an intimate member of the tribe, replete with shibboleths; a political coalition which provides a sense of mission and morale; an excuse for past and future failures; a colorful subculture (color=engaging); and a subculture where being a loser is considered at least acceptable and at most honorable. The female stereotype that exists ambiently in American media culture and is greatly exaggerated in anime only amplifies this: women can be cute and ditzy yet incompetent and still retain ultimate social value; I believe this is why anime is a risk factor in transitioning.

Verbal social reinforcement is an extenuation of the physical body-grooming that primates engage in as a social need, required to feel socially secure and bonded to members. There is still a relic of this link in our instincts: men still embrace with hugs, coaches pat on the back, and in the past it was normal to sit on your friend’s lap or hold hands (the early Christians had “laying of hands”, and would smooch their brother on the lips before prayer, this kiss ritual mentioned five times in the epistles). So TSE is highly desirable: you get the verbal “grooming” and it is linked to your own body, satisfying a deep evolutionary need.

The transgender epidemic also appears right at the advent of “toxic male gamer” discourse. It’s easy to forget how <2012 entertainment culture catered to men who were mediocre. A chubby guy in a dirty room lifting a middle finger to his improbably attractive girlfriend was an acceptable form of gamer media. You had Weezer, Shaun of the Dead, etc where being a male loser in a bromance was a romanticized social identity. Perhaps this is related, too: maligning “loser male identity” means those guys have to find identity elsewhere, unlinked from being male.

Honestly the recent adventures of Will Stancil has been a good reminder of why posing as atleast gender questioning as a white male in left spaces is probably a good idea. Stancil is a true believer but has no Idpol clout so gets nuked every time he thoughtcrimes.