Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
No, he insulted my pedigree by insinuating I don't have one. If you look up the definition of pedigree, it's an insult to blood. I'm sure he meant school but that's almost as bad, especially by repurposing that word.
Ruthless or just incompetent? If test scores aren't a part of your "ruthless" filter, you're just doing DEI for striver kids at that point.
So they are just lazy and incompetent? Maybe I don't want to work with them then.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2025%3A14-30&version=ESV
Is it really this bad? I can try to kind of do 2 but I'm not going to do anything I don't enjoy that isn't profitable. I kind of assumed a smaller form with some competent, legacy American hiring managers would be smart enough to interpret my résumé correctly.
Whining about the hiring practices of highly profitable and successful firms in a cutthroat industry because they won't give you the time of day is a very bad look.
It's silly to think the correlation between hiring competence and profit is 1. Or even over .70.
If hiring the right people has little relation to making money, I don't know why you think they'd care about your GPA.
Do you think hiring is the only factor in firm profitability?
One of my closest friends is a CEO of a medium sized tech company, and after years on the job he is convinced that correct hiring is by far the most important part of a well-functioning company. Good people make everything easier, and even just a few troublemakers can drag everything down. According to him, most experienced managers he's talked with agree.
You may claim they are wrong, but I'd be surprised if managers in prestigious, ultra competitive fields think differently.
Do you suppose their hiring could be good but not perfect?
Of course, since the answer to "is x perfect" is almost always "no", for any important irl task. The actually relevant question is "are their hiring practices EV+, especially compared to whatever deepneuralnetwork wants them to do?" to which the answer is also "of course".
You don't seem to grasp how much money is on the line and/or how important even a small statistical edge can be in ultra-competitive fields.
There is no reason their practices are more EV+ than my suggestions. I could very well improve their hiring processes, but this hasn't happened due to lack of the sufficient competition which would require this. Their hiring practices are good enough to let them be profitable firms, while still letting me rationally critique them.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link