site banner
PaperclipPerfector  11d ago (text post)   28705 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 2, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

At risk of revealing a few more details about my life, a lot of the work we do around GPS technology has just been completely screwed over this week in that whole region. Real time location systems, GIS survey work, everything that requires accuracy is just buggered thanks to consistent GPS jamming over the ME.

Import of technology, movement of staff both heavily impacted; we had a couple of people stuck in Dubai and airlifted back to their home countries on emergency basis. At work, there's definitely been some kind of concerted mindset effort to pretend that this is business as normal and we're just modifying timelines with the expectation that we'll have to learn to live with it until the situation resolves itself or calms down.

I would not at all be surprised at Dubai's attitude; they don't want their well-heeled business and tourist clientele to flee the place permanently. Dubai's reputation was built as a safe haven, but for that to hold the haven needs to be, well, safe.

I noticed something ominous before the news of the first missiles coming in when I noticed Waze wasn't working in certain areas in Abu Dhabi. For context Abu Dhabi has far more "targets" and government institutions and potentially more discrete things than the other Emirates. Waze works in most of the country, stops when near DXB airport. So I'm guessing the jamming/spoofing is concentrated around targets.

is just buggered thanks to consistent GPS jamming over the ME.

Aren't jammers a big glowing flare saying "bomb here". Why aren't GPS jammers dealt with a swift cruise missile to the face?

GPS is a very weak signal by the time it arrives all the way from a high orbit: not hard to jam or spoof as compared to something like radar. Jammers can be cheap and numerous.

My understanding is that modern jamming techniques are a bit more subtle than those of the last century. Rather than drowning the whole band in white noise they inject spurious and contradictory data into existing signals which then causes the receivers to glitch out.

This shows a major weak link in globalization all the foreigners you've imported can just flee if things get bad.

Especially an issue for a place like Dubai with minimal safety nets for foreigners, though I guess the other alternative is 'net drain foreigners cling to the host country whilst reasonably-productive ones go off and try to look for the optimal deal elsewhere' is even worse.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats