site banner
PaperclipPerfector  13d ago (text post)   28823 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 2, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

3
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Historical intelligence and sharing allegations: In the early 1990s, a major controversy arose when San Francisco police raided ADL offices, uncovering evidence of extensive spying on thousands of activists, organizations (including Arab-American groups, anti-apartheid activists, and others critical of Israel), and individuals. Court documents and reports indicated that some of this information was shared with Israeli government officials and intelligence agencies (including Mossad). The ADL settled related lawsuits without admitting wrongdoing, but sources like The Nation, MERIP, and others described it as part of close ties where the ADL provided data to Israel (and sometimes the U.S. State Department or FBI) on critics of Israeli policy.

  • So yes in the past they have literally operated as an arm of Mossad. From Grok.

Listen, you need to decide what you want. If you want to vent about how ADL hurt you, sure, go ahead. I mean, I don't care but you are free to do it, we're in a free country. I won't debate you about this because frankly out of all shit that is happening what information ADL shared in 1990s with Mossad is pretty low on my ladder of priorities, sorry, there are much more important (for me) things that are going on right now.

If you genuinely want to get smart Jews to join MAGA, then I am just telling you right now, starting with how ADL is bad because it supposedly spied on commies and/or Jihad activists in 1990s (ah the times where there were so few of them you needed to actually seek them out instead of just pointing at a random leftist!) and how all Jews are now tainted because of it - is not going to work very well. Just so when it does not work very well at all, you won't be surprised. I mean, out of all ways to get people to play on your side, you choose pretty bad ones so far. If you really want it (and not just using it as one more item on the list of why Jews totally suck) I'd probably try some other strategy.

Listen I’m Italian. When people look at genetic code I’m more related to ashkenazis than Anglos. So Jews are like my cousins. Doesn’t change fact I’m sick and tired of Jewish politics

I note besides the case of ADL in 1990s (which is not very political anyway), you didn't really mention anything specifically you're sick of. I mean, I am not happy about a lot of things Jewish Democrats do, I can make a long list, but this is my list. And I don't use terms like "Jewish politics" - beyond somewhat less virulent hate of Israel, the politics of Jewish Democrats is not different from the politics of any other Democrat (which is kinda exactly the problem). So, what is "Jewish politics" you are sick of?

Running hate propaganda against me for 50 years

I don't think I understand what are you talking about. Do you mind speaking plainly? What kind of "hate propaganda" specifically Jews run against you since 1970s? Why do you call it "Jewish politics"?

Honestly feel like you are being obtuse. Isn’t this common knowledge at this point? Every policy that promoted discrimination against white men has been heavily pushed by the ADL the most prominent Jewish interest group.

That's like me saying open borders is "Catholic politics" because Catholic Charities USA spent billions of taxpayer dollars enabling those policies. Would you say blaming every Catholic for the consequences of open borders policies enabled by this is fair?

I am not being obtuse, I am trying to figure out if there's a way for me to explain to you what kind of fundamental error you are making. That, of course, involves understanding the essence of your complaints, and figure out why you erroneously chose to single out Jews as a source of these complaints.

Nobody I know who is catholic has ever had any relationship with Catholic Charities versus ADL having the highest funding of any Jewish group and direct Mossad links.

So yes Jews can get shit for why Israel does in America. This is like Germany 1945 and you can’t find a single Nazi to blame. If a policy is popular with 80% of Jews and backed by Mossad then it’s fair to blame the Jews.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats