Vengeance (2022)
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Notes -
That Twitter line was one of my biggest laughs last year. Novak is a sharp observer; but, unfortunately, he's also insecure about it and weighs down the final act with a lot of unnecessary explicit explanation of his ideas and themes, so that we can acknowledge his wisdom. If he can restrain that impulse, he'll become a really good filmmaker.
People have been talking up Kutcher ever since I’ve been aware of him, for his nuance as an actor, his academic credentials, and some sane choices he’s made as an adult. I haven’t seen any of his films (that I’m aware of), but I think this will be my first.
I agree that Ashton Kutcher's a strong actor. His capabilities are underestimated because he's so handsome (Brad Pitt, James Franco, and perhaps Leonardo Dicaprio have a similar "problem").
I don't doubt he made some good investments, mainly in tech (sane choices, at least with hindsight). But academic credentials? Wikipedia says he dropped out of the University of Iowa to pursue professional modeling - surely the best academic decision he could have made.
More options
Context Copy link
You mean insane choices ? As I recall, he was married to Demi Moore at some point.
Pretty successful venture capitalist
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link