This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
He can't fire you for being pregnant, female, black, Muslim, gay, trans, or disabled, so I don't see why he can fire you for being a Republican, Communist, believer in race IQ differences, or a supporter of Palestinian independence. Especially if you do those things outside of work. Which is always the fear. It's never, I'm going to proselytize to my coworkers, it's always, what if my X account gets doxxed and all these comments I made on the internet outside of work get me fired. We could just make that illegal.
Protection from termination for political views varies by state, and- perhaps counterintuitively but unsurprisingly- it tends to be blue states which have strong protections for political views, theoretically to protect union organizing.
More options
Context Copy link
Maybe they should be able to fire people for the former things as well. Overly irrational amounts of bigotry are eventually solved by free markets. If you pass up too many good candidates just for them being gay or black or Republican or communist, you're going to do worse business wise. And there will be smarter businesses and competition that don't care about those things and just want to win in the market. It's not that irrational amounts of bigotry don't happen at all, but that they aren't really as meaningful.
Anti discrimination laws don't really have much of an impact, since in a democracy for them to be passed it requires a population that is already rather anti discrimination! So they're gonna be mostly not doing too much irrational discrimination on their own. At least, not those outside of what society already generally wants.
Make what illegal here? The doxxing or the firing? Doxxing being illegal doesn't really make sense, it's historically considered a form of free speech and free press. Journalists would try to reveal anonymous people all the time in the past.
Only if there's enough competition. Which in most sectors, there isn't. You know, because, there's only so many people.
Their impact is bounded, but not necessarily 0. 60% of people can easily force 40% of people into behaving differently in a Democracy. Which is roughly what happened with Civil Rights.
Firing. That would be the extension of civil rights. Although you could make doxxing illegal too. The precedence for this in the United States would mostly be 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030. Weev went to federal prison for publishing a list of emails he got from a public HTTP API, because AT&T did not intend for the API to be public. Doxxing works on the same principal; it's the publication of information that was not intended to be public. The onus is not on the doxxee to secure the information 100% properly, because Congress has already rejected pure internet anarchy. If the information is reasonably interpreted to be intended-as-private, access and publication could be said to constitute exceeding authorized access. I just read a doxx on Howling Mutant in fact which used two data breach leaks as proof! That could obviously constitute felony usage of felony-produced data, just like using leaked passwords to break into an account. Morally, doxxing is obviously a crime which has a victim, which the criminal intends to harm, which makes it much more of a crime than probably the majority of so-called computer crimes the United States prosecutes.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link