This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
OT - here’s an African Development blog seems rather new but there’s a few interesting posts. I was struck by this article asking why there are so few African mining billionaires. It does seem like one of the easier businesses to get rich in - establish some amount of political control/monopoly on violence and dig things out of the ground sometimes with foreigners help. The two richest are South African. One white and one black (SA has had a law a mining license needs 26% black ownership maybe that helped)
Another article had me thinking about why Africa was so sparsely populated until recently.
For the most part it uses a traditional development economic arguments. Reading these articles had me thinking a lot about Garrett Jones arguments.
https://kenopalo.substack.com/p/natural-resources-and-economic-underdevelopment
The 'digging things out of the ground' part is highly technically complex. You also need to purchase and maintain all the expensive equipment.
It's really quite daunting.
Economically speaking you can hire people for that. It’s not like inventing a new thing. The Saudis when they went from Western taking the money still used western for a while to do the drilling.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link