This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
He sounds like... A Redditor. Of the stupidpol variety, but nothing too exceptional (didn't look through his profile--I wonder if he was on stupidpol). I think you're treating mood affiliation rhetoric as actual ideology. In terms of how he'd actually vote, it wouldn't be dissimilar to any other Democrat who would run in a Senate primary would vote; to the extent he didn't, it'd just be on votes that either had no chance of passing or no chance of failing, as a dispensation granted him by leadership.
It's really just an aesthetic choice: slimeball in a suit vs erratic disordered rebel. I'm sure neither is what is actually optimal, but the latter wins over the former. A large group of Democrats are enraged at the status quo (say what you will about their prescriptions for moving away from the status quo, but the sentiment is genuine) and will be thrilled by the aesthetics he brings, and the ones who actually are happy with things but want to be the ones running the country will fall in line.
Redditor was my impression too, believe it or not. But you're underselling how radical the typical redditor is these days, and I feel like I've heard "oh, this doesn't actually matter, nothing to see here" about a thousand times by now.
I didn't see anything from /r/stupidpol. Wikipedia said
but that was after his account was discovered, and probably just lip service. Beyond talking about colonialist history, I doubt there's too much idpol in there.
Here's a non-exhaustive list of the subreddits he posted all of his 2014 comments in. You'll see that he browsed a very wide variety of subreddits, posted in some of the dumbest front page ones sometimes, and had a lot of masculine interests. I think most of it is in /r/Maine, /r/Military, and /r/USMC.
Maine USMC Military liberalgunowners QualityTacticalGear SocialistRA politics WarCollege CombatFootage HistoryPorn Infantry pics leftistveterans guns syriancivilwar history IAmA WarshipPorn PropagandaPorn redneckrevolt WTF todayilearned u_Hardtokillfitness (likely just the one post mocking it) Ayahuasca aww worldbuilding NFA CredibleDefense ar15 ak47 videos funny esist kurdistan space AskReddit worldnews MilitaryStories AdviceAnimals UkrainianConflict Fitness afghanistan gaming wikipedia movies
Perhaps; I spend as little time on it as possible (and am pretty sure I have a shadowban anyway, for unclear reasons).
In lieu of a Redditor, how about a poster from rDrama running as a Democrat in Michigan?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
Kind of reminds me of the fashion controversy back in the 20th century over whether or not Hugo Boss was a racist, due to his fashion design choices for the Nazis uniforms. Although he was a member of the Nazi Party, he joined two years before Hitler even came to power; and that mostly for purely business reasons to secure government contracts. After everything came to light about who the Nazis really were and what they did, they expressed all the regret in the world over their decision.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link