This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Following up on an earlier post of mine, the Democratic National Convention has released their long-awaited "autopsy" report. Critics of the party will get some immediate schadenfreude upon opening the document: the default font, the hastily-added red addenda by a higher power, the missing sections and absent formatting. The sick pleasure continues upon the realization that neither Biden's senility nor the Israel-Gaza conflict (nor the associated hysteria) ever appear in the 100+ pages.
Digging deeper, CNN reports that the autopsy was compiled by "Democratic consultant Paul Rivera," a veteran of the Clinton administration and friend of DNC chair Ken Martin. Rivera's minuscule effort and misguided conclusions result in a paper with few citations, ignorant assessments, and a half-assed attempt at shielding the DNC from the worst of it.
Well, that's certainly backfired now. The DNC hasn't looked this incompetent at its highest levels of power since the scandals of 2016 (say, was anyone ever held accountable there?) and the oft-panicked-about "competence crisis" appears to have reached a high point.
I saw the highlights of this over on rDrama and yikes. One table about political funding and spending couldn't even add up the numbers correctly (I checked and yes they were wrong, p. 127 here). If this really is what the report is like, and not some out-takes or edited parody version, God above. If this was produced by a 16 year old Transition Year student on work experience where I work, it'd be scrapped and (kindly) pointed out what was wrong with it.
If this was some sort of preliminary draft sent out by mistake, that would be embarrassing but understandable. If this is the finished (or as finished as it gets) production, may the Lord have mercy on the Democrats because they need miracles. The DNC chair seems to be saying it's real, but now I really need to know who produced this. He doesn't say who did, just who he didn't get, and looking at this mess maybe he should have gone for the slick professional consultants:
"I chose someone who I thought could produce this type of report". Please, please, please let it be a useless nephew of his wife or other family member who was given the opportunity out of pity in order to throw him a few bob out of party coffers in the guise of "working" at a "job". I would rather the explanation be nepotism and slush funds. Because if Mr. Martin picked someone he genuinely thought would do a bang-up job, then once again, may the Good Lord Above take pity on the Democrats and this is why you guys lost in 2024, Ken.
EDIT: I see above that the author was one Paul Rivera "a veteran of the Clinton administration and friend of DNC chair Ken Martin". If this is a veteran Dem insider, they really are in trouble. How on earth did he manage to let this slip through? Did he indeed hand it over to some intern to work on? Did he start it but then decide not to go any further because nobody would care by the time the midterms came round and they (hope to be) winning all round them, then he had to scramble to throw something out to Ken because he said "No, I really do want it"?
EDIT EDIT: The more I read, the worse it gets:
How did they get themselves into this state, and how will they get out of it? Remember, this is the party trying to run on competence, technocratic solutions, and being smarter, richer, saner, and more compassionate than Orange Man Bad. If this is an example of "we've got the wealthy, well-educated, better informed people" then may the Lord in His mercy be kind to Belfast.
Ok, thé Clinton admin had a lot of basic competence at politics- but it was also 30 years ago. This guy could easily be experiencing age related decline, which coupled with the democrat party’s political correctness demands makes a ‘good’ report harder to come by.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link