site banner
PaperclipPerfector  23d ago (text post)   23637 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of May 18, 2026

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Issue is that well, I don't really know if he had any knowledge of it.

CNN: Graham Platner’s claims that he didn’t know tattoo was Nazi-linked undercut by new evidence

In one thread from 2019, Platner weighed in on a conversation about the “Totenkopf” — the skull-and-crossbones emblem worn by Nazi SS units that his own tattoo would later draw scrutiny for resembling — to note that many US service members had adopted similar imagery, such as the Punisher skull used by some Navy SEALs.

Using his longtime Reddit handle P-Hustle, the former Marine infantryman and future Democratic Senate hopeful also argued in a 2020 online discussion that “SS” lightning-bolt tattoos were a "culture” marker within Marine Scout Sniper units, not an expression of White supremacist ideology.

When commenters in the 2020 thread described the lightning bolts as a Nazi or racist symbol, Platner dismissed the criticism, writing that outsiders “have no idea what they’re talking abou” and added, “I will be sure to inform the Black guys I know with bolts that they’re Nazis now.”

Copies of the threads were archived through the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine and on a separate Reddit archiving website.

CNN also spoke with an acquaintance of Platner from more than a decade ago who said Platner spoke about his tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol. A second person told CNN that they learned of the tattoo years ago from the acquaintance, who told them that Platner had described it as a Nazi-style design.

CNN also reviewed a text chain between the acquaintance and another person discussing Platner’s Nazi-like tattoo several months ago, before the story became public.

I find the position he implicitly expressed in his Reddit comments, that Nazi symbols are a cultural tradition in the military with no particular ideological meaning, to be much more believable than his public claims. Because Nazism is the most taboo ideology in western society, Nazi symbols are likewise taboo, which means they are cool and edgy and costly ingroup signaling, which means they become cultural traditions among certain groups like criminals and soldiers that some people get regardless of ideology. The appeal is especially strong when combined with the Nazis being a militaristic group associated with the most famous historical war. As he alludes to in the second comment, the Nazi SS symbol was particularly heavily used by the Marine Corps Scout Snipers, with Wikipedia claiming its usage dates back to the 1980s and continued to some degree after being banned in 2012, but similar dynamics cause people to get other Nazi symbols as tattoos on a less organized scale. Sure. However I don't think this is an argument that most of his political allies would normally be sympathetic to.

That also sounds like a decently likely explanation! I've definitely seen that a lot of modern Nazism/communism/etc extremisms tend to come from wanting to be edgy or extremist or cool first as their motivation, and the actual idealogy is just backfilled in.

It's like the adult equivalent of a child saying poopy or other childish "swears" over and over again as their mom scolds them for it.

However I don't think this is an argument that most of his political allies would normally be sympathetic to.

See also: the stars and bars Confederate battle flag being considered anything other than ultra-racism these days, as opposed to when I was younger and I knew plenty of people (including progressives) who didn’t mind it being on the General Lee.

That's the Confederate battle flag. The Stars and Bars is a different flag and I expect a majority of progressives wouldn't recognize it out of context.

Whoops, quite right!

However I don't think this is an argument that most of his political allies would normally be sympathetic to.

Having to run cover for Bill Clinton's sexual misconduct made the Democrats, at least temporarily, more moderate on the issue of sexual harassment. With any luck, this will make the Democrats more moderate on Cancel Culture, at least for edgelord Nazi related stuff.

However I don't think this is an argument that most of his political allies would normally be sympathetic to.

Because it's all friend/enemy, or who/whom, or whichever phrasing you prefer.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats