Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 65
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Remember that submission I had shortlisted? It got accepted!
Congratulations.
More options
Context Copy link
Um. No. Sorry. Accepted for what?
In the last couple years, I've had a pretty bad run of luck with open fiction submissions, after being fairly successful before that. I recently wrote an original piece for an anthology that got shortlisted, and now formally accepted. I'm pretty excited about it
Congrats! Did you do anything differently to improve or get back to form?
I'm going to try to avoid culture warring here, but I filtered my submission list pretty heavily. Most of the outlets I've worked with in the past are having a hard time right now.
A lot of them went full woke in 2020. This meant that unless you could assert some kind of special status, you got put on the bottom of the pile. This sucked for me because I can't claim a special status, and it sucked for the publisher because their existing readers stopped buying, and the new stable of authors didn't pull in the crowds that the publishers expected. The revenue loss meant they couldn't accept as many submissions, which lowered my odds even further.
Concurrently, the AI content tsunami over the last few years hit the industry like a freight train. Historically, the fact that writing takes more effort than reading shielded the industry from bad actors. Once generative text turned that convention on its head, it was almost impossible to get a signal through the noise. Bigger buyers had to shut down submissions for months as they figured out what to do with tens of thousands of nonsense manuscripts pouring in every day.
Thankfully, I've found a handful of publishers who are:
It's a small market, so I probably won't get the chance to publish often, but low odds in a small market are better than zero odds in a big market.
I understand. Guess I can't ask who these non-woke publishers are, without infringing on your opsec?
I'm wondering why you are drawn to writing and getting published. Is it like, a need? Lately I've been feeling more and more of 'having something to say and needing to say it' but I'm crap at actually getting my thoughts across so that others can understand them. :I
Look for smaller publishers who release a lot of mil-sf.
I like to entertain, and if I'm going to do it with my writing, I need an audience.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link