This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Epstein was an intellectual dilettante who would have been a second-rate shitposter here. I don’t think he was particularly well informed. He was likely very intelligent, but that is different.
And how does that make you feel, JD? There is almost no greater piece of evidence that the Epstein thing is overplayed than this kind of comment.
People who are actually of extreme value to intelligence and centrally important to some kind of secret organization don’t get arrested after being the target of an impossible to hide FBI investigation for years, subject to hugely public legal proceedings, and then die in allegedly mysterious circumstances in a Manhattan jail, before their lover / accomplice is sensationally also arrested and subject to years of public proceedings and media/public outrage that pressures congress into releasing tens of thousands of related files. They just die, quietly, and a few lines are written about them in newspapers. “Epstein died some years after serving a brief sentence for sex crimes. There were embarrassing photos of him with Prince Andrew. He died in his sixties in Paris of heart failure.” Fin.
Vance plays along even though he knows it is ridiculous for a sitting vice president to acknowledge a government conspiracy that occurred, allegedly, under the nose of then-President His Running Mate and Most Noble boss, but he also knows that the most controversial thing for Rogan’s normie followers would be for him to deny an Epstein theory, which is now not even the midwit position but the entirely normal one.
Assuming ZOG100% conspiracy theory where Israel owns and controls US completely, yes. Ofc, plain reading of history of US-Israeli relations debunks this. Many cases where US told Israel big no and threw wrench into their plans.
Assuming ZOG80, ZOG60, ZOG50 etc... it is rather plausible that Israeli operative, even high ranked one, gets into trouble with parts of USG who are not happy with Israeli influence, either in general or in this particular case.
More options
Context Copy link
That could be true, but it's also rather unfalsifiable. Are there known examples of this happening we can point to? Well no, given that their success would be a secret after all. So it could be the case that all the intelligence connections just die silently, but it could also be that they don't just off people either.
We might see it happen in the failures, where someone almost died and then whistleblows. But I don't know if there's many of these.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link