site banner
birb_cromble  5d ago (text post)   773 thread views

Weekly Finance Thread - 2026-08-01

A weekly thread to discuss financial matters - from personal all the way up to global.

Ground Rules

  • Remember that we're all just Internet randos. Don't bet your life savings on a hot tip from this thread.
  • Keep culture war in the culture war thread. Yes, global events may impact our personal finances, but that does not mean we have to incessantly harp on culture war aspects here. If you are going to discuss it, please stick to the practical impacts of it on an individual level.
  • Be kind. Remember that everyone here comes from different circumstances. We all have different resources available and different risk tolerances.
  • Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Better is better. Celebrate people when they take a step up and work to move their finances in the right direction. Don't flame out because they haven't followed what you consider the optimal path. Everybody has to start somewhere.
1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

One common friction point that keeps coming up in these threads is something that I can't clearly name, but seems to be the friction between one person's perceived optimal behavior and another person's risk tolerance. One person will say that they are doing something, and another person will comment that the first poster is Doing It Wrong because they believe there is a more optimal path that they could take. It's a very binary thing that seems common in the Internet in general. I think it comes from a benevolent place, but it seems like it can push people off from the topic entirely as much as it can educate them.

I've been thinking about that lately because of events in my personal life. My partner is a fairly responsible saver, but she's not really investing. She's in the upper half of her age group for net worth and doesn't have any debt, but I worry that inflation is going to eat those savings over the long term. I've gently tried to get her to consider moving some of that money into funds over the years, but for her, it's entirely too much risk. I've not really pushed on it because what she's doing is better than doing nothing, and nothing is her alternative right now.

For somebody who has that extreme level of risk aversion, what options are there that beat a HYSA? Browbeating her into equities isn't going to fly.

On a similar topic, are there "non optimal" things that you do financially, but you do them anyway?

  1. I pay ahead on my mortgage, even though the interest rate is "only" 3.75%.
  2. I hold some dividend stocks and funds, and even commit the cardinal sin of holding them in a taxable brokerage account.
  3. I don't use credit cards outside of the bare minimum necessary to keep them active.

In all three cases, it's entirely a psychological thing for me, and I recognize this. In the first two in particular, it's still better than not doing anything at all

Yes, my brother-in-law is like your girlfriend. He’s…not young, and every dollar he’s saved is in a savings account. He’d be worth 3, 4, 5x what he is now if he had gone the index fund route, but for some reason that’s not convincing. I think because that doesn’t address the reason he fears risk in the first place.

He also has, so far, refused to get a mortgage, despite the fact all the options they looked at would have resulted in mortgage payments less than their current rent.

The frustration is how much more materially comfortable they could be—right now—if I had been managing their finances for them, or if he’d be willing to bear one iota more risk.

Your point is well-taken, and in that same spirit I don’t harass this man about his financial leadership in his family.

There is a happy medium, and I believe it exists. For example I sell options. Right now, I have a notional risk of 7x-8x my taxable portfolio’s actual value. If the market went to zero I’d lose in the market double what my house is worth. That seems insanely irresponsible to the average person, so I’m very shy about it irl, and I am extremely selective about to whom I mention what I’m up to.

For example I sell options. Right now, I have a notional risk of 7x-8x my taxable portfolio’s actual value.

You sir, have balls of solid rock. There is absolutely no way I could bring myself to do that.

Looking back, the fact that I invest at all has more to do with an accident of fate than anything. I grew up dirt fucking poor. I don't mean "we couldn't afford a new car" poor. I mean "we had to cut slits in my shoes and tape them up because I outgrew them and couldn't afford replacements" poor, or "had a big, filling glass of water for dinner at least once a week" poor.

My first job out of college didn't pay handsomely, but it was enough money that I could dump 13% of my paycheck into my 401(k) and still feel richer than I had ever felt in my life. Every time I get a raise, I increase my savings one way or another and keep my spending power constant.

Absent that, I'd probably be like your brother in law. The terror of being poor stays with you wherever you go. I still regularly wargame what would happen if I lost my job, and wake up at night thinking that I'm going to lose my home.

I think about my relatives who haven't been able to get out. What advice do you offer to somebody who's still working retail in his 30s and has been turned down for his last ~50 applications to better jobs? "Just invest in SPY, bro" is going to bounce off their real-life circumstances so hard that it probably does more harm than good.

What advice do you offer to somebody who's still working retail in his 30s and has been turned down for his last ~50 applications to better jobs? "Just invest in SPY, bro" is going to bounce off their real-life circumstances so hard that it probably does more harm than good.

Ask them if they like free money.

The Saver's Credit isn't quite as good as a government match on retirement contributions (being a nonrefundable tax credit), but it's still pretty dang close to "the government will give you money for investing."

Ideally, you could bring them around to opening (say) a zero-fee Fidelity IRA, making enough of a contribution for the free money, and investing in a cheap target date index fund ("it's like you get a financial advisor rebalancing your account, but for free!"). Even a little bit will help supplement social security in retirement.

If you can't talk them around to that, see if you can at least get them to open a free Roth IRA, make the minimum contribution to get the government match, and then just leave it in the MMF that Fidelity defaults to (I keep saying Fido because I'm familiar with their interface/offerings; I'm sure plenty of other brokerages are the same). Tell them they can treat it as a bank savings account (since contributions can be taken out), but the interest earned will be tax free if they leave it there (since everyone loves not paying taxes). That way they get the government refund, and at least have the retirement account open, even if they're not leaving the money in it/invested, and that's a start.

And then let the inevitable corporate barrage of emails and ads about "let us help you save for retirement, here's some money tips" start to slowly do their work.

If I'm reading this correctly, you have to itemize to get the benefit, right?

I'll be have to do some math to see if that would beat the standard deduction for them.

It looks like you can take it and the standard deduction, since it's a credit rather than an itemized deduction. Kind of like the Lifetime Learning Credit.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats