This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Yesterday in the UK a farmer noticed something odd - three white vans blocking a road and "a large group of hooded and masked men" who hid when they saw her near RAF Fairford. She called the police and five men were arrested. International story, were these men agents of Russia? Iran? Homegrown terrorists?
85 homes were evacuated while the bomb squad investigated the vehicles. Trump stated that intelligence agencies had their eyes on these guys, while other people noted that this contradicted the official story of a chance random encounter leading to the arrests. Other news articles indicated the air force base had been under heightened security leading up to the event, while paradoxically other news articles indicated nobody was guarding the place.
What everyone did agree on was that these people were dangerous and definitely up to something not good. Which is obviously the reason they were released a day later on the most "stringent bail conditions."
...What?
Ok, I'm supposed to come up with a better conversation starter than just disbelief so... why did this happen? Are the suspects brown and they just cannot conceive of holding brown people without bail? Are they actually not all that dangerous? Is it a foiled false flag? An interrupted training exercise?
As far as what I can tell, there was a legit intelligence murmur about an attack.
Then a farmer saw some browns. driving a van, they got the entire terrorism and bomb squads called in on them, and finally they determined they were just regular diesel fuel thieves.
Presumably, at this point, the original attackers, to the extent that they were even ready operationally to go, will lie low for a while or choose a different target.
It’s worthy of a Guy Ritchie movie
My conspiracy brain wonders whether this was happenstance or "parallel construction" on something that they expected to be there via means not intended to be disclosed.
given that the farmer is now publicly embarrassing them by contradicting the official account and reporting that the government hasn't contacted them for a witness statement, I'd say probably no.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link