This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
idk man, it's kinda weird to uphold a magically trans'd 13 year old as a shining example of wholesome trad right wing romance.
Let's be completely real for a moment. If men as a collective were interested in heartfelt romance stories -- with an "almost complete absence of smut", no less!! -- then they would simply be producing and consuming more of that type of content, given their ample opportunity and ability to do so. As opposed to, you know, creating and sustaining the entire video pornography industry. People vote with their feet. (I say all this as a man who actually prefers words to images; but I'm aware that I'm an extreme outlier in this regard and my preferences don't match the male norm.)
All that being said, romance fiction for a straight male audience has existed for decades in Japan, they're called visual novels, and funny enough a lot of the more celebrated ones do follow the general outline discussed in the ShamashAran post you linked ("boy meets girl, and then the world comes after them").
As I understand it, Malfoid is not in-character trans. The idea of Malfoid is that the character of Draco(nia?) Malfoy was always female in this universe.
In that context, I mean, Harry Potter is famously kind of conservative if you think about it. Harry Potter is a story about a boy discovering that, unbeknownst to him, he was born into aristocracy, and inheriting a full ride to Eton or Harrow. He is then trained in and formed by these traditional, elite, European institutions, displays exceptional loyalty to them, and fends off and defeats a populist revolt led by a strongman.
Add in the romantic fantasy and is this not a fantasy about a better world, associated with the past? One of benevolent authorities, traditions, and meaningful struggle to defend something good? In some of the fantasies the OP links, the role Malfoy plays is to uplift Harry - to, however sharp-tongued she may be, encourage him to dress well, practice his manners, and generally become a worthier man.
You don't see how any of that could be interpreted as wholesome trad romance?
Does this work? The Death Eaters are mostly old aristocratic families, right?
It's more like Harry takes a side in a conflict between nobles, but one of Voldemort's most significant tenets is getting the Muggle "common people" out of the wizarding world and ruling over both, so I'm not sure he can claim the common man on his side.
In the context of wizards, I think we're meant to read Voldemort as engaging in a kind of fascist politics of purification - unite all the 'true wizards', blame everything bad on a scapegoat minority (muggle-born and muggle-sympathisers), and then pursue a larger project of conquest and expansion. I think populist is a reasonable word to use for that kind of politics.
It's just a little confusing because whenever Voldemort got in power, he was mostly ruling through fear and seems to have done little to nothing to get the general wizarding populace on board. He got a few power-seekers and harnessed the existing bureaucracy, but wasn't pursuing the "common wizard" at any point I can see.
How small can your "true wizards" group be relative to the general population before you can't call it populist anymore?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
It kind of works. The Death Eaters ally themselves with many of the outcasts of wizarding society like giants and werewolves.
Considering how scandalously Hagrid's half-giant ancestry is treated, and the way Umbridge talks down to the centaurs, and the things Dumbledore says about the lie of the Ministry of Magic statues (which depict all the other sapient magical races looking up to wizards), I think it would be possible to reframe Voldemort as a populist getting all of the hated rabble and dregs of society onside along with a handful of elites, and revolting with them.
I do wonder about the werewolves and giants that sided with the Death Eaters. Even if they enjoyed "being themselves" during the war, surely they understood that there was no way that a blood purist group would ever give them a good deal once the war was actually won. Like, the Malfoys might be willing to do an alliance of convenience with Fenrir Greyback, but it's kind of hard to imagine them ever accepting or tolerating his existence long term after a victory.
They might just have been desperate for even allies of convenience. Very risky, but not unheard of.
"Japan Forms Alliance With White Supremacists In Well-Thought Out Scheme"
More options
Context Copy link
In the very funny fanfic Seventh Horcrux there's a recurring bit where characters reference Voldemort's horrifying agenda of blood and terror "... except for the Werewolf Rights Act, that was very progressive, and...
More options
Context Copy link
This is a great point I forgot about, probably because we don't really see much of those groups or get a feel for how big they are. Harnessing the oppression of groups that the current government doesn't favor is a lot more like a populist movement than how he was interacting with the other wizards.
I guess the monstrous groups figured any port in a storm: infighting in the wizard government would give them more freedom to do whatever they wanted, and even if Voldemort wasn't interested in keeping them around, he's got a much more ambitious project to work on in conquering both worlds, that might give them time to get out from under the wizarding boot and be ready for when he finally comes for them.
More options
Context Copy link
Certainly the Death Eater vision is pure-blood wizard supremacy, but they appear to have been flexible enough to recruit other magical races by promising to elevate their status, or give them revenge on their traditional enemies, or something similar. I doubt the Death Eaters ever intended to treat werewolves, giants, vampires, etc., as equals, but useful allies are useful allies, and I could see the werewolves going for that deal. From the werewolf perspective, you know all the wizards look down on you anyway. That's your default. The Death Eaters share the prejudices of their fellows, but they also offer you potential power and a chance to strike back at some, if not all, wizards.
I would not be surprised if Greyback or his fellows intended to betray Voldemort at some point in the future. In the short term, though, they seem to have shared a common enemy.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
usually internal / Watsonian logic of these sort of fics is more like alternate history where the respective canonical character is replaced with a suspiciously similar character with different sex (or other life circumstances), not a story about a magical HRT.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link