This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I don't know about office but the games weren't reverse engineered, they were decompiled, as far as I'm aware anyway.
Presumably the solution will be some sort of run-time encryption, possibly combined with requirements of being online and some parts of programs running off-device?
And as far as I'm aware, decompilation is a kind of reverse engineering. You use Ghidra or some other decompiler and get the assembly code, and then you write something that does the same thing that the original functions did. The best ones might match byte-for-byte when compiled with the same compiler, but otherwise, a good goal is to get each function to output the same things given the same inputs. The guy who reversed Diablo seems to use the terms interchangeably.
Edited to add: on your solutions point, there is only so much you can do. Even without AI tools, Red Dead Redemption got cracked eventually, despite its DRM protections. You can always set up a server emulator or your own server, which happened with Club Penguin, and probably will happen with World of Warcraft.
Reverse engineering seems like the wrong word when the decompiled code essentially amounts to an extremely detailed instruction manual.
I'm not saying this isn't impressive, it's just that the office and Photoshop things seem much more like reverse engineering. Decompiling is something different.
More options
Context Copy link
It's pretty different as used here though -- for one thing "super-decompiler" is pretty neat, but not nearly as impressive as "can code office from scratch"* in terms of broad applicability of the tech.
Decompiled software is also still covered by copyright, so while new forms of piracy are also pretty neat I don't really see much of a business impact here?
*More like "can code an office demo from scratch" AIUI at this point, but still pretty impressive
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link