This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
There was a hearing today in the house about the origins of covid19: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aXXWRaM-sWQ
I highly recommend watching this. The level of gaslighting being done by the "bat soup" conspiracy theorists here is absolutely a spectacle. I feel like we are watching a narrative being generated in real time here.
Jamie Raskin's seething is particularly incredible. He is now claiming that Covid was Trump's fault because Trump was being too nice to China, and was too nice to Xi. They are continuing on now that The Republicans, and their "conspiracy theories" about covid origins have caused people to lose trust in institutions.
I'm almost at a loss for words at watching this. Absolutely incredible.
They're now saying that this entire hearing is invalid because one of the witnesses wrote this book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Troublesome_Inheritance?useskin=vector&useskin=vector
Was thinking of posting on this subject and tie it into other thoughts floating here.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/faucis-lies-exposed-jim-jordan-goes-ballistic-over-scientists-lab-leak-flip-flop
Key point excluded government officials who thought lab leak. And the whole 3-day flip flop by a few scientist who went from looks like a lab leak to absolutely not a lab leak. I guess you can see new evidence to flip flop that fast but “what was it”. Would love them to question Anderson.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/new-who-chief-scientist-made-crucial-change-paper-claiming-covid-19-didnt-come-lab
The making the sausage part of the absolutely not a lab leak paper.
And to tie it into election fraud claims someone brought up the old martyrmade twitter thread. One of the key points in his thoughts is the right was confused on the election and while they didn’t know if their was fraud they were 100% sure if there was fraud that the narrative makers would tell them it was the “safest election in history” narrative. I agree with this completely. I don’t think we had fraud but if we did have obvious fraud the media and establishment would have given the same message as the 2020 election where I don’t think fraud occurred.
Only because you mentioned him: Just want to say that I cannot recommend martyrmade's history podcasts enough. Just absolutely unbelievable levels of quality. As far as I've found there is nothing that even comes close to it.
and yet no link?
https://martyrmade.com/podcasts/
https://martyrmade.substack.com/
thanks much!
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link