site banner

Qeekly Finance Thread - 2026-10-24

A weekly thread to discuss financial matters - from personal all the way up to global.

Ground Rules

  • Remember that we're all just Internet randos. Don't bet your life savings on a hot tip from this thread.
  • Keep culture war in the culture war thread. Yes, global events may impact our personal finances, but that does not mean we have to incessantly harp on culture war aspects here. If you are going to discuss it, please stick to the practical impacts of it on an individual level.
  • Be kind. Remember that everyone here comes from different circumstances. We all have different resources available and different risk tolerances.
  • Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Better is better. Celebrate people when they take a step up and work to move their finances in the right direction. Don't flame out because they haven't followed what you consider the optimal path. Everybody has to start somewhere.
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm a fan. I personally wish the furthest out had a lower bond allocation than what I've seen (8-10% seems to be the base; I'd appreciate the option of 5 or less), but they're a great default option, the asset mix means they'll never be the worst performer in a list of options which is great for psychological reasons, and for the vast majority of people with 401ks, "don't letter 'better' be the enemy of 'good enough'" really needs to be the philosophy.

If anything, though, recent papers on retirement allocations have me thinking their main problem is at the end of a career, not early (where the limited bond allocation doesn't have too much of an effect). From what I've read (mandatory disclaimer: God Almighty am I not an expert), it's looking like a "bond tent" may be the way to go: that is, after it reaches the conservative retirement allocation, instead of staying flat, the glide path reverses, and starts shifting back to more equities once the worst "sequence of return risk" years are past.