site banner

Midterms Megathread

Cause otherwise midterms discussion will be scattered around a bunch of separate Culture War thread posts. And it's nice to have more off-the-cuff rapid reactions in a dedicated megathread.

The first thing I've noticed so far: if the exit polls are correct, Americans are very pessimistic about AI.

15
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Gateway Pundit is reporting that there is a legibly fraudulent pattern of statistical anomalies in this election’s results. They posted the math for anyone to see. The original reporting comes from TruthIsFreedom on X.

Like any good epistemologist, they basically call it predictive: pick a county, apply their formula, and see that the result matches.

Although I’m a minarchist libertarian Republican, I’m probably one of the few remaining advocates for Trump on The Motte, from what I see in these threads. I’m not here to argue that point, FYI. I’m here to ask people not to simply disregard it out of hand because Trump reposted it or because it has LLM speech hallmarks. The allegation is so monstrous that, for the sake of the perceived legitimacy of our democratic republic, the mechanism needs to be explained by literally anything besides malfeasance.

Excerpts posted here from GWP so you don’t have to give them ad revenue if you don’t want:

One formula fits all of it: Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024 Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024

For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side. The numbers: Senate: Republicans kept 85% of Trump’s share Governor: 86% Variation explained: 88%

What makes it strange: It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.

The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races. Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.

Why seats flipped: At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.

What this means: Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.

A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.

So, what’s the benign mechanism that explains this?

Man, it must feel great never having to self-reflect.

If the people vote for you, then that is only good and right. However, if the voters from Maine to Mississippi completely reject what you're selling, then it must've been rigged.

And what self-reflection exactly should happen if you can take the vote counts from a previous election for every county in states from Maine to Mississippi, subtract 15%, and accurately predict this year’s vote results?

It seems to me that putting last election’s results into Excel and applying a formula should never predict election results this accurately.

What's more likely, that thousands of different precincts across America, many of them in deep red rural counties, conspired to elect Democrats, or that an LLM-slop article from the Gateway Pundit is bullshit?

But it's clear that Democrats should just treat post-election conspiracy theories as background noise. The right have apparently decided they're incapable of losing elections, even with sky high consumer prices and disastrous foreign wars.