Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?
This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.
Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Jensen Huang just got busted having an affair with what's probably a Chinese spy.
Jensen is a wifeguy of 41 years. In some sense he probably never stood a chance.
Blow-ups like this reinforce my bias that while poly/open relationships exist, you can't get away with them if you're a high status man. Sure, if you're a billionaire CEO, your wife may say she's okay with a discreet affair but she'll deny it and throw you to the wolves (and take you to the cleaners) if it ends up on the front page of the NYT. Similarly, women having affairs with married billionaire CEOs may be driven crazy by being #2 bitch in a way that they wouldn't really mind if the man had normal status. And if they are okay with it, it's probably because they're spies.
Now Jensen's wife hasn't said anything about divorcing him, but he's publicly apologizing to her and his family for this, so I presume they at least need to keep up the appearance that they're not poly. Since poly is low status.
Am I wrong?
The custom that a fortunate man cannot part with his fortune is unreasonable. Consider:
Clearly, it would be better for someone more brilliant and more capable of loving his wife to take over one of the largest AI hardware companies. Huang is a leftover from when it was a gaming company, but it is taboo to take a fortune from a man and give it to someone better able to make good use of it.
Yeah, that's what I keep coming back to. Bro got into this to make 3d games go fast. Being one of the most important people in the AI revolution is way out of his depth.
Its not like it happened by accident. Nvidia foresaw the use of their cards for scientific computing when none of their competitors did. Like all siccess stories, Huang was lucky that the future came in a particular shape, but he also made very savvy moves.
This is not true. Both AMD and Intel saw this coming at roughly the same time (eg, see the Xeon Phi line), but were too focused on CPUs to really capitalize on it. Nvidia's success is less in the foresight and more in the lack of distraction at the time.
See my reply to @dailydogma. Other companies may have dropped the ball, but NVIDIA definitely picked it up early.
I agree with you that Nvidia made some very savvy moves, but "foresaw the use of their cards for scientific computing when none of their competitors did" is not among them. Everyone saw this coming. What crowned Nvidia was the accessible software ecosystem they built around the cards. AMD has always been really weak on the software side, which caused them to fall far behind. Intel was too focused on their CPU market and the Phi line was a product of that--it tried to be a GPU you could program like a CPU. IBM had similar problems as AMD, though less due to being weak on the software side and more due to being run by lawyers that want to make sure nobody can ever actually use it.
Okay, that's fair. They executed well, though, and my point is more that NVIDIA (and Huang) weren't just silly gamers who got the AI revolution magically dumped into their laps.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link