Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 38
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Today is the 15th anniversary of Fenton's run across Richmond Park, London. There are so many elements here that consistently make it funny to me: the fact that the cameraman doesn't laugh until right at the end, the off-camera shouting getting increasingly more desperate, the deer start moving, leading to the big reveal of Fenton the dog nailing life, and his out-of-breath owner desperately trying to catch up while dropping exasperated "Jesus Christ"s... it's a great video.
It got me thinking about virality, as in, would this video still do the kinds of numbers it's clearly capable of doing if it were released in current year? Would the uploader be able to resist adding a bunch of tiktok "FAAAA" sounds or other nonsense over it? So much about what makes the video good is how understated everything is. It just kinda happens--nobody is directing the action or commenting on it. Mr. Beast would probably edit it significantly. Would people be able to sit through the first 16 seconds of the video, a bunch of boring, everyday, out-of-focus deer, before we even hear the first "Fenton!" without abandoning it and scrolling for more interesting content?
I like to think so.
Well I enjoyed it. My issue with the beginning wasn't that it was boring or out of focus, but that the camera shake threatened to make my eyes bleed.
Worth though.
I think that's mostly because he's zoomed-in quite a bit, probably in an effort not to disturb the deer, which could be another layer of comedy given what happens
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link