site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 20, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just as follow on, and in the spirit that everything related to Trump is culture war:

https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/19/politics/trump-voters-of-color-analysis/

Pull quotes:

The fact that Trump is doing considerably better among Republican voters of color than White Republicans flies in the face of the fact that many Americans view Trump as racist. I noted in 2019 that more Americans described Trump as racist than the percentage of Americans who said that about segregationist and presidential candidate George Wallace in 1968.

This fact should be the smoking gun that we're not talking about the same thing that we used to with the term "racism". The american public pretends to believe that Trump was more racist than Wallace.

Indeed, the Republican Party as a whole has been improving among voters of color. The party’s 38-point loss among that bloc for the House of Representatives in the 2022 midterms was a 5-point improvement from 2020. Its margin among White voters stayed the same in exit poll data.

This is political realignment from the inside. It's slow, it could reverse or it could continue. I believe very strongly that the political coalitions are going to change composition quite a bit in the coming decade. I don't know what the issues will be, but the separation between the working class (see our discussion in last week's thread) and the middle class is becoming big enough to win elections on. The question is which party will get which side, and in what quantities.

As a point for discussion, if (and it's a big "if) the Republicans fully take up the flag of the working class, would that make them the left-leaning party?

As a point for discussion, if (and it's a big "if) the Republicans fully take up the flag of the working class, would that make them the left-leaning party?

No, because the "working class" (as in the class of people actually doing physical work) has historically always been more right-wing and/or conservative than their counterparts in the bourgeoisie.

Shhhhh, I'm baiting here......

Congratulations, it worked, now stop being an ass.

Have we met?

The question is legitimate, the answers interesting. The fact that "leftism" most commonly presents as the middle class cosplaying as the working class to try to join the upper class is context for later.

Are you talking about America or generally? Because at least in Europe, during Cold War times, the socialist and communist parties genuinely were working class parties by any definition one might choose, both regarding their voter base, membership and leadership.

I'm Primarily thinking in terms of the US but from what I gather that the politics of the UK and France have followed roughly similar paths. Support for "Revolution!" or any other "latest new thing" always seems to be most pronounced amongst the leisure and academic classes. Where as the core of conservative electorate ends up comprised of craftsmen and cab-drivers.

At least the biggest Western European Communist parties were, during their glory days, firmly working class in, as said, electorate, membership and leadership. For instance, there's a paper here detailing the correlations between worker representation in electoral areas and Communist party vote ("worker" here being basically a very strict definition, ie. non-retired, non-academic urban manual worker; much of the rest of the CP support came from already-retired workers and peasants and other rurals). This started changing in the 70s, as educated "technical" workers started replacing manual workers, but this is also generally associated with the deradicalization of the Communist Parties. The most notable French CP leaders also came from the working class, Manuel Thorez was a coal miner and Georges Marchais a mechanic.

Anglo countries are different, since they never really developed Communist Parties as a force, so the academic utopian segment - always present in all CPs, but as a minor force in actual mass parties - was considerably more important in their consistency. Labour had a strong working-class base until fairly recent times, as well.