site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 3, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

12
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

By more than two-to-one, Americans support U.S. government banning TikTok from Pew Research

More than twice as many Americans support the U.S. government banning TikTok as oppose it (50% vs. 22%), though a sizable share (28%) are not sure, according to a new Pew Research Center survey that comes amid intensifying scrutiny of the Chinese-owned video-sharing app.

Support for a government ban on TikTok is higher among Republicans and independents who lean toward the Republican Party than among Democrats and Democratic leaners (60% vs. 43%). It’s particularly high among conservative Republicans (70%) and less so among moderate or liberal Republicans (46%). Among Democrats, conservatives and moderates are more supportive of a ban than liberals (49% vs. 36%).

Older Americans are much more supportive of banning the platform than younger ones: 71% of those ages 65 and older support it, compared with 54% of those ages 50 to 64 and fewer than half of adults under 50. Those under 30 stand out for being the only age group in which more people oppose banning the platform than support it (46% vs. 29%).

I can't say I'm very surprised but it's more that I assumed it was getting banned either way. I'd be interested to see the trend over time to see if there's been some manufacturing of consent.

I think that sort of support (especially since the GOP is onboard and not playing criticizing) basically gives the government all the cover they need to actually do it but we'll see.

One of the small subthreads of commenting on the recent right-wing victory in Finland (I will hopefully have a longer article on this soon so I haven't commented yet here) is that the right-wing populist Finns Party has a very high youth support, and one reason that's been suggested for this is that they have young politicians who are very adept at creating fast-spreading provocative content (of the "SJWs getting OWNED by facts and logic!" type) on TikTok. If EU starts discussing a TikTok ban as well, I wonder how that would affect this strategy (they'd probably just move to another platform, though).

If EU starts discussing a TikTok ban as well, I wonder how that would affect this strategy (they'd probably just move to another platform, though).

Given how much platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter have been pushing their own versions of portrait-aspect-ratio-short-videos, that's what I'd guess too. The extent to which YouTube has been pushing their "shorts" to me as a viewer has been... almost upsetting, TBH. And from what I've heard, they've been pushing creators to it as well for better overall treatment by "the algorithm," though I take that with a grain of salt. This sort of follow-the-leader effect by TikTok has been by far the worst impact of TikTok I've noticed, as someone who doesn't use that platform.

Given how much platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter have been pushing their own versions of portrait-aspect-ratio-short-videos, that's what I'd guess too.

Tangent: I've never understood the portraitification of everything. Do people not realize smartphones can be turned on their sides? Or that not everyone is viewing content on a smartphone to begin with? Why would anyone want to view something in portrait form?

I can understand the desire. If you're using your phone on public transit or walking, it's significantly more convenient to hold it in portrait mode than in landscape mode. At a minimum, it's more comfortable to the wrist, and due to how big modern phones tend to be (which is a problem in itself; don't get me started about the lack of sub-5" flagship phones, when sub-4" should be the actual standard), the button placement might necessitate the use of 2 hands. For me, I just don't have any interest in watching short 15-60 second videos, portrait or landscape. It seems like a pathway to addiction and constant dissatisfaction over needing the next bite-sized thing, which I get enough of in text form on Twitter.

Do people not realize smartphones can be turned on their sides?

It's a lot more clumsy to film stuff in landscape. You have to grab the phone by its edges rather than have it be an extension of your hand (so the shot is more stable and a bit more physically intuitive to "aim") and your fingers easily get in the way of the camera.

And when you're making bite-sized throwaway content, especially when it involves a person (taller than they are wide, usually) I'm not surprised the portrait mode is being used for portrait content.