site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 3, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

12
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

  • It reinforces the victim status of the most financially and politically influential ethno-religion in America. This prevents reasonable discussions like, “should we be okay with Jews being 3x over-represented at Ivy League schools for 100 years, while their interest groups attack gentile Europeans for over-representation”

  • It reinforces the “villainy” of Europeans, which is alleged to be complicit ideologically in the holocaust

  • It detracts from what we should be learning about re: WWII, like the enormous sacrifices of white Christian American men

It detracts from what we should be learning about re: WWII, like the enormous sacrifices of white Christian American men

World War II casualties by nation, ranked from highest to lowest:

Soviet Union - 26,000,000

China - 15,000,000

Germany - 5,533,000

Poland - 5,820,000

Japan - 2,830,000

Yugoslavia - 1,700,000

Romania - 1,600,000

France - 600,000

Hungary - 580,000

United States - 405,000

Italy - 410,000

United Kingdom - 383,700

Canada - 42,000

Australia - 39,700

Netherlands - 301,000

Greece - 520,000

Czechoslovakia - 345,000

Belgium - 88,000

Norway - 12,000

New Zealand - 11,900

As a percent of the population, America is not even in the top 20.

Depending on the use of "we" in the above, it's entirely reasonable for @coffee_enjoyer to consider the most relevant sacrifices from the perspective of an American to have been the American men that died. I think this is particularly true if one thinks the cause of the Allies was righteous, as Americans elected to join the fight in Europe rather than being forced in by direct attack. I would go so far as to say that Americans should care more about the men that died storming Omaha beach than Chinese people killed in Nanking. The Rape of Nanking is just about the worst thing I've ever heard about in my life (tied with a hundred other horrible things), but the proper American focus is on the valor of men that won victory.

What happened at Pearl harbour?

Can you elaborate on what you're looking for as an answer? If you're suggesting that I should include the defeat of Japan alongside defeating Nazis or Iwo Jima alongside Omaha I certainly concur.