This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Is everyone who does something bad far-right or far-left? Coming from a debate on Reddit where there was an attempt to label the 21 year old military document leaker far right. This seems to be the new national past time. Any time someone does something bad they need to be placed in one of the two camps. Trans school shooter = far left. Pelosi attacker = far right. Louisville bank shooter = far left.
WaPo has labeled the leaker as far-right because I believe there is a video of him shooting a gun and saying some racists words. I’ve always liked this Barkley quote:
https://newsone.com/2768946/charles-barkley-racism-in-locker-rooms/
Male culture especially younger boy culture likes to say things they’re not allowed to say and tease each other. I don’t think that makes someone far-right. I have multicultural group chats where we do the same thing Barkley describes.
But overall I’m noticing that the media when something bad happens wants to pin it on a side and make them responsible for whatever bad thing happened. My guess on this leaker is he’s just a dumb kid and probably hasn’t even ever voted. Nonetheless media now needs to make one side take responsibility for him which then forces the other side to defend him and increase polarization.
I think some times people do bad things or stupid things without having a political ideology.
It doesn't make you far-right per 20th century definition but per 21st it does.
The people in charge are busy bodies, school hall monitors.
In the US could lose your job or have CNN come to your door (this happened for somebody managing a FB group) if somebody linked you to specific screenshots/video from these chats.
Or you could have Capitol police at your door if you joke about AOC.
In Europe you may get the police at your door depending on the joke.
Far right by definition should be 1-2% of the population. Even today this behavior is far above that level. But yes I agree they get labeled that.
It depends what you consider far-right. Were the Nazis far-right? They were a lot more than 2% in Germany.
The Nazis arose in part due to resentment on cultural issues vis a vis Weimar Germany, when progressives of the time started coming up with ways to do surgery for sexually-confused people.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link