site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of April 17, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

8
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It depends. A lot of people do hold politically correct opinions out of fear. And for me, the tell is exactly what was in the blog post — the opinions are incoherent, contradictory, and don’t stand up to the slightest scrutiny. Saying “I’m obviously right and you’re a [sneer term] for disagreeing,” isn’t the position a person who had a coherent theory about the world or their politics. And from my observation this tends to crop up in higher levels of society. If you’re a parole and paid hourly, nobody gives a fuck. But once you start getting into the higher levels of business and politics, it becomes necessary to hold the right opinions. It even, at high enough levels, becomes necessary to protest or donate to the right causes. Failing to do so can limit your career, cost you friends, even family.

It was really obvious to me when Trump came about. I didn’t vote for him, and I think he’s an ass, but really, as far a things he did, he was either a 1990s era democrat (keep in mind that democrats had at that time favored a border wall, and championed “don’t ask, don’t tell”) or perhaps poor judgement. But people seemed to lose their minds, not only at him personally, but at people who might have some modicum of support for him or anyone not personally opposed to him. In 2016, people bragged about walking out of thanksgiving dinner because someone at the table was pro-Trump. But, these same people were conservatives before, and you did eat with them. In the same time period, people were harassing diners they knew were republicans out of restaurants, shaming people for wearing red hats, etc. it was extremely performative, very loud and very public. Even today, people feel the need to blow the “I’m not a filthy heretic” trumpet in any news discussion or political discussion.

And what’s changed is our panopticon. In 1996, you could plausibly keep your opinions to yourself. In the age of social media, it’s almost impossible for you to do so without taking extra steps. And I think people are afraid of their social credit going down if they’re discovered to have crimethink on their social media or know people who do. And I think everyone knows it at this point, we have an informal but effective social credit system enforced by HR departments terrified of discrimination lawsuits, and workers who know this have to be liberal enough to not trip the “thought crime” alert. So they organize protests, they bitch about “evil republicans” online, and purge their friends list of any filthy conservatives.

It's always amusing to me when people say, "why does the Left freak out over Trump? He's just a 90's Democrat."

First of all, that's not really true, but we'd probably disagree on that, but also, that doesn't matter.

A 1965 Democrat who ran the median 1965 Democratic planks on social issues would've likely been more comfortable in the GOP as well - as we saw happening in the South during this time. Social change happens, and people uncomfortable with that social change align with the political movement that'll stop that change.

Well, the freak outs included warnings against literal Nazism. If the 90's democrats too were literal Nazis, I think we're overdue for some Nuremberg trials. It might also mean that maybe Nazism isn't all that bad. Take your pick.

Saying “I’m obviously right and you’re a [sneer term] for disagreeing,” isn’t the position a person who had a coherent theory about the world or their politics.

Yes, it is. That theory is "I belong to a group with actual power and you don't".