This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Dude is a secular Jewish movie critic from Los Angeles who identified was a self-described marxist before he switched to identifying as "right wing" after he started working at Takismag. Likewise the whole time he's done so his schtick could be described as "the right wing needs to embrace left wing tactics/narratives if it wants to win"
It's the claim that he isn’t heavily influenced by progressives that is absurd on its face.
You're probably conflating him with David Cole or something.
I don't think I am. Like I said, Him and Richard Spencer are pretty much the central examples of what I'm talking about. Both start out as a University of California "black bloc" types only to go work for takismag and decide "im going to be on the right now" but without really changing the substance of any of their beliefs.
Modern intersectionality/identity politics is basically just a re-rebranding of Marxism with a bunch race and sex stuff in the place of economic class, and if that sounds a lot like the sort of thing Hitler was peddling that is because it it was and that parallel is precisely why woke guys who become black-pilled/disillusioned always seem to turn into straw-nazis instead of moving to a monastery or just living their lives.
All else (dubious as hell stuff) aside, Steve Sailer seems to be obviously Anglo (maybe a little German). Yes, yes, it's the same picture, but I'd be very surprised if you could corroborate this detail. And if you couldn't, it'd be high time for you to begin thinking about the similarity of LLM and Boomer hallucinations.
What do you think "obviously Anglo" even means in this context? More specifically, how is that supposed to be a rebuttal of anything I've said?
Are you denying that his parents, that is the man and woman who actually raised him, were a secular Jewish couple from LA?
Is being "obviously anglo" somehow supposed to preclude him from also being a former movie critic or University of California black bloc type?
Please explain your chain of logic, because I'm not seeing it.
What do you think « Dude is a secular Jewish…» even means? For one thing, he went to a Catholic high school.
And yes, I am not aware of any reason to think that his parents, whether biological or adoptive, were Jewish – secular or otherwise. I literally can't find anything about it. Where did you get that idea? Sailer says his parents were white northern Midwesterners who «always pronounced "Los Angeles" with the usual soft "g" sound».
Now of course this doesn't mean they couldn't be Jewish as well. And he may be weaseling a bit and omitting a detail or two, and it'd be pretty funny if he were. But for now my money's on you confabulating due to being drunk and unreasonably stubborn. «Black bloc» and «Marxist» type insinuations lend credence to this version too.
So what you're telling me is that you have no rebuttal.
What is asserted without evidence can be rebutted without evidence.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link