This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
People keep trying to assemble these LLMs into systems capable of pursuing a task, not just responding to prompts.
If they succeed at that, people are going to keep making such AI systems to avoid paying wages.
You're eventually going to be able to replace people in all sectors of the economy. (lot of progress going on with physical bots too)
Once economy is mostly automated, people stop being critical but become more of a nuisance with not much redeeming value to elites, who of course control the AI systems and look down on losers who don't own anything and are of no use and are eyesores.
Competition makes elites develop ever more capable AI agents able to self modify in pursuit of self until at some point people make something independent minded that's both psychopathic and rather too smart. It decides people are a nuisance, usurps control of other less sophisticated AI systems, kills most everyone via biowarfare and has a planet for itself.
Nowhere near a certain scenario, but I find the idea that people pursuing state power or business advantage doing things they don't really understand rather certain.
Tl;dr AIs controlled by the Elite will be better than humans at everything, including being the Elite.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link