This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm gonna need you to substantiate this claim.
Can you name a counter-example? Australia is the largest I can think of, but even there, growth has been slower since 2014 while the US has pulled ahead, so I think I'm still right.
Australia's GDP per capita is significantly higher than in 2008
South Korea's GDP per capita is significantly higher than in 2008
Germany's GDP per capita is significantly higher than in 2008.
Probably there are other examples, but 3 should do.
Germany is 10% since 2008. That isn’t “significantly higher”. Australia looks like it went from 54 to 61 in that time period. Also NOT significantly higher. This is 14 years and sub 1% yearly increase.
More options
Context Copy link
Are you genuinely claiming that living standards have substantially improved in Germany since 2008? I'm unsure whether you understand my question, it's not a pure GDP/capita play.
As for Germany:
So a growth of 6,000 euros since 2000. In the US, which started the century at a similar level, per capita increases in average income sum to approximately 300% of that figure.
Well, I invited you to explain what exactly you were claiming and you didn't really clarify. If gdp per capita isn't what you're talking about, what is? And what do you mean by "substantial"?
More options
Context Copy link
If not GDP, what kind of metric do you have in mind?
I’m not sure I’m following the Germany example. Regardless of how it stacks up to our apparent €18,000 growth, it’s still a 16% improvement. Is that not significant?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
True, and a good example. I was thinking about whether to add 'Western' but didn't.
I still think it's true that the US economy is visibly doing better than developed European economies, both in statistics and anecdotes.
But 'access to good and services' still is improving in europe - they can buy the latest iphones, the latest cheap TVs, use all of our nice internet services, etc! Most quality of life improvements in america are at least partially exported to Europe because there's profit to be made there too!
I don't think anyone is arguing against that more modest claim.
That is the claim. Return to my original comment and you find the words “significantly improved”. The modest increases in QOL in Germany don’t count as significantly improved. Eastern Europe was still ‘developing’ in 2008. South Korea is the only true exception among ‘major’ countries, which I admitted.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link