site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 17, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

True, but on the other hand, I think there are times you could make a fairly solid case of a character being stealth gay. To take Burt and Ernie as an example. They live in the same apartment, as unrelated males. They (later on) have a child (Bort). They have no girlfriends or wives or dates, or anything else that implies an interest in women. It’s not impossible to see gayness in a set of characters in that circumstance.

They (later on) have a child (Bort).

it has been a long long time since I watched Sesame Street so I've missed that one. Thank God. I'm sticking with Bert being interested in pigeons only.

It was honestly from memory. Bert does have a child, but the name was Brad not Bort. And he’s a ginger too (https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/muppet/images/7/73/1068_Brad.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20190804132642)

I had to look that one up because good grief, they've changed it all since I was twelve 😁

Brad is Bert's nephew, not his child; seems Bert has/had a brother Bart, who had a kid. Bert looks after Brad when Bart is out doing his travelling salesman work.

So while that clears up that Ernie and Bert did not adopt a gayby together, it still leaves it unclear if they are two gay puppets in a long-term committed relationship or not. And where is Brad's mother, if Uncle Bert has to look after him? Is Bart married and divorced? Is Bart gay and this is his adopted/surrogate child? Given that Bert and Bart are twins and both have dark hair, he must get his red hair from his mother. So where is Brad's red-haired mother? Is Bart the real father after all, because dark hair should be genetically dominant over red hair? Did Bart murder his wife and her lover and that is why he is a sole parent now????

I'm sticking with "Bert is only interested in pigeons" for the sake of my remaining sanity. Because speculating about the sex lives of hand puppets is getting too dang weird.

Bert and Ernie are in a children's show and code as children. Children often are closely associated with other children to whom they are not married (relatives can literally be in the same apartment, but even unrelated children are forced together in social situations), and don't have girlfriends, wives, or dates.

I always thought that Ricky and Lucy not sleeping together was gay propaganda. Why are they not sleeping together? What are they saying about him? Is this some kind of sham marriage?

While mandated by the Hayes Code for media purposes, having separate bedrooms was a common (if upperclass) behavior until it started to be stigmatized in the 1950s and 1960s.

I can vouch that I've seen separate beds for real married couples in a few period recreations and museums. The curators have always mentioned it wasn't an unusual ideal at the time. Although upper classes always get more depiction in the historic record.

Back to the original TV question, observers of modern television often note that characters have far larger and nicer apartments than their demographics should be able to afford.