This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I don't have a satisfying answer, although the text you're citing isn't what was given as evidence a couple posts above.
The flip side to that question is, if true, where is the money going? Hunter Biden is worth 250 million, so we're talking a 7 figure salary, no? Joe Biden's net worth is estimated to be 9 million, so if Hunter is kicking him back 5 million a year, where is the money going? Presumably not real estate and cars, unless he's got a couple dozen lambos tucked away in the Delaware batcave.
Digging into articles on the subject, they don't exactly paint a picture of Hunter funding Joe's lavish lifestyle:
Don't know. Curious to see what they were buying, or if there's any evidence that Joe was actually making extravagant purchases anywhere in the ballpark of what you're alleging.
Maybe to his son, who is somehow worth 25x as much as Joe despite executing a business strategy of smoking crack with loose women?
More options
Context Copy link
Why the heck does an 80 year old want a lavish lifestyle? My grandpa is 100 and has been telling me for 20 years about how he hopes to die soon because everything sucks. His feet hurt, his hips hurt, he can't taste Borsht anymore. Anyone nearly that old with children is living strictly for his progeny.
More options
Context Copy link
83k a month from the Burisma job specifically.
I do not know exactly how Joe Biden laundered the proceeds of his crimes, or why they aren't included in an "estimation" of his net worth - your objection immediately falls apart when I point out that an estimation is not a serious, rigorous and independent audit, but I think the claim is actually even weaker than that. In the same way that my inability to explain exactly which creature first developed an eye is not evidence against the theory of evolution, my inability to clearly identify the bank account Biden used to store the proceeds of his crimes is not evidence that the crimes did not take place.
Alleging? I think the word you're actually looking for is "providing clear and undeniable evidence of" - the texts are legitimate and real. The fact that I do not know exactly how Joe Biden hid and/or spent the proceeds of his influence-trading and ostensibly illegal bribery is not an argument against him receiving the funds at all. If I won the lottery and then continued to live largely the same as I did before (except for spending vast sums of cash on illegal drugs in a manner that would not show up on my official tax return), would you take this as evidence that I did not actually win the lottery? You've presented a standard of evidence which cannot be satisfied without total access to the President of the United State's financial details, including ones he explicitly wishes to keep hidden as they constitute evidence of criminal behaviour.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link