This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This is like saying you abhor Zionism because you have non-Jewish friends. You have non-white friends, so you don't think white people should retain any ethnic identity or advocate for it in any way? How does that make sense? Do you deny any other ethnic group its ability to advocate for its own interests because you have friends outside that ethnic group? I have non-Chinese friends so I abhor Chinese nationalism I guess... Would that make sense to you, or does this sort of logic only apply for white people?
I kind of do abhor Chinese nationalism? And Russian nationalism, and so on, proportional to how much each feels like a threat. It’s worse when it’s explicitly racial rather than cultural, because
America is the best in the worldmy own cultural values say that race-based nationalism is silly at best. Civic nationalism or patriotism is much more comfortable.In America, there are a lot of white people, and a history of wignats organizing to do stuff I don’t like. Therefore, they get a few bumps up the threat ladder. Even though I don’t think they have any credible route to harming me or mine, they rate higher than most other racial nationalists. Ingroup, outgroup, fargroup, I suppose.
Working on down the line, Israeli nationalism doesn’t feel as threatening. I know you probably disagree with that.
No you don't, a Chinese person identifying Chinese and having a healthy level of ethnic self-regard and association with Chinese history and culture and advocating for the interests of the Chinese both in China and abroad, you would not find "abhorrent", do not lie. If China wanted to remain Chinese, which it does, you would find not find that abhorrent.
What a cop-out, as if "wignats" are the only population group that have identified as white and advocated for white people. The very people who founded America identified as such and had strong associations with their race, so White Nationalists also have a history of organizing stuff you do like, to a much more impactful degree in your daily life than Jewish nationalism without any shred of doubt.
What's threatening is advocating for ethno-nationalism for your ingroup and individualism for your outgroup, which is what Jewish nationalism does. But because of the alchemy of Hollywood and our cultural institutions, this state of affairs doesn't feel threatening to you, and I believe you that it doesn't. But demographic change is proof that this state of affairs has real-world implications, it doesn't feel threatening because if you perceived it as threatening you would be ostracized from society.
95% of people have no issue with this.
What is a good level of ethnic self-regard? Why should a Chinese person support Chinese people more? If it's 'genetic self-interest for overall genetic health', why not pick the smart jew over the dumb chinese?
nobody has an issue with this.
Vacuous claim, this entirely depends on which interest are being advocated for.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link