This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I didn't vote for trump and was happy with the 2020 outcome...
This was the first time such a system was used. There was good reason for doing so (covid) but I can understand people being critical of it. Immediately labeling it bad faith is unhelpful. Doing things like censoring statement comparisons from the 2016 and 2020 elections, makes me think they might have a point.
This kind of hubris is going to cost us another election.
I wonder if there is anyone who voted for Biden but thinks the election was stolen against trump
What would this prove aside from the existence of echo chambers?
How about actually engaging with the points someone is trying to make?
More options
Context Copy link
There have been multiple polls by Rasmussen (and others) who identify something like 30%+ of registered Democrats who answered "It's likely" to the statement "How likely is it that cheating by corrupt public officials prevented Trump from winning the Georgia election in 2020?" over the last few years (geez, it's already been almost 3 years since the 2020 election).
So, there are likely lots of people who voted for Biden who think the election was "stolen," i.e., that corruption/fraud/illegal ballots affected the outcome of the Presidential election in 2020.
More options
Context Copy link
I voted Biden, and while I don’t think the election was necessarily stolen, I do think the methods used in 2020 in particular make it insecure and therefore making fraud almost impossible to detect. And no democracy can survive if you have a method of voting where you cannot be sure that the results are real. I’m not going to pretend that the problem doesn’t exist.
A method that doesn’t allow for cross checking and auditing is simply not one that the public can trust completely.
More options
Context Copy link
Statistically, that person is present among every noticeably large gathering of minorities.
More options
Context Copy link
Actual neo-nazis probably fit the bill weirdly enough. Like that one guy recently interviewed that fought for Azov and voted Biden to support Ukraine.
Come to think of it, a lot of hardcore Marxists probably qualify as well.
More options
Context Copy link
I voted for Biden, but it was a close decision and one I now regret (even though I live in a state where my vote wouldn't have made a difference). I think it's more likely than not that the election wasn't stolen, but I'm not willing to dismiss the possibility out of hand, especially because Democrats consistently oppose efforts to make elections more secure, such as requiring ID or forbidding others from mailing in your mail-in ballot.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link