This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Sidney Powell has taken a plea deal in Trump's Georgia RICO case regarding the efforts to overturn the Georgia election result.
Under the terms of the deal, she cops to 6 charges, the RICO charge gets dropped against her, she gets 6 years probation (so no jail time), pays a $6k fine, provides a written apology, and testifies against Trump and other co-conspirators. Considering the serious exposure she had, I count this as a pretty sweet deal.
Interestingly, Kenneth Chesebro (another co-conspirator) reportedly rejected a similar plea deal. He has asserted his right to a speedy trial, and that is set to start very soon. We shall shortly see which of the two of them made the right call.
Seems like a poor choice by Chesebro. $6K to make it all go away seems like a pretty darn good deal to me.
Maybe he thinks it's too cheap a price for his soul.
Which is to say of course that someone who has been 'conspiring' with Trump probably believes in him and believes him that there was fraud involved. And someone who believes an election was fraudulently won is unlikely to respect the frauds now in charge and might even think being jailed is a small sacrifice for saving their homeland. Or similarly he might think an $8k fine for insurrection is a sign his opponents have no faith in themselves and their case.
To be clear, Chesebro has not been charged with insurrection or for any of the events at the Capitol on Jan 6th. He has been charged for his involvement in the Georgia false elector scheme.
Saving the term insurrection for the capitol shenanigans is in essence agreeing it was an insurrection. I do not and I have no respect for the idea, so I call anything Trump 2020 related an insurrection with the exact same amount of respect for the term as I would use referring to the capitol shenanigans, which is to say none.
Yes, but you were referring to the state's understanding of "insurrection." If I said, "he might think an $400 fine for robbery is a sign his opponents have no faith in themselves and their case," and you pointed out that he was charged with shoplifting a can of tuna, not robbery, it would hardly be a convincing response for me to say, "well, I refer to all types of larceny as robbery." What does my personal definition, of which the authorities have no knowledge, have to do with how strong the authorities think their case is?
No, I was guessing at the reasons he wouldn't take the plea deal. I didn't think it was necessary to ensure my hypothetical thought processes favoured accuracy over rhetoric.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link