site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 6, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think ultimately, Israel and Palestine is such a scissor statement that I don’t think there’s much chance of finding a middle ground. I think at this point, whether we admit it openly or not, the crisis is down to which country will exist. Either the Jewish State of Israel will control all the land or the Arab state of Palestine will. Both sides and their supporters understand this because there has never been a long term real peace. The ceasefires have mostly ended up being the time when everyone reloads and upgrades their weapons.

The degree to which this realigns American or Western European politics depends mostly on how important and long lasting the current war becomes in the West. If this is a minor blip on the road to Jewish conquest of Gaza and the West Bank, then I think it’s going to be hard to unite people around hating the Jews. If it becomes a potential flashpoint leading to wider conflict, I expect it to be something that overshadows other points. If the biggest issue in the next two election cycles are economic, or law and order, or similar, I don’t see Jews being a trump card simply because most people will be worried about food costs or safety or things like that to worry about Jews fighting in a tiny corner of the globe that has few natural resources, and unlikely to ever affect them personally.

If this becomes a Left Thing like South Africa was in the West, I think the Jews are screwed long term in Israel. Once it basically becomes a meme they all support, it's hard to stop them because they are so relentless about it plus they have the whole Muslim world on their side too.

The question is will that actually happen. I don’t see how it does, because at the end of the day, there’s a contradiction in the sense that on the one hand never again and on the other is from the river to the sea (code for eradication of Jews in Israel). You cannot both say that the holocaust was Terrible when Germany did it and then repeat the exact same things the Germans did and calling for the death of Jews with intellectual integrity. The difference at least in Israel is that this time the people calling for the death of Jews are unwilling to do the deed themselves and thus will sadly shake their head as they die at the hands of people that the West refused to let them fight back against.

You cannot both say that the holocaust was Terrible when Germany did it and then repeat the exact same things the Germans did and calling for the death of Jews with intellectual integrity.

Sure you can, if your intellectual basis is "oppressor-oppressed dynamics." Just argue that in the Holocaust, Germany was the oppressor and Jews the oppressed, but here, Jews are the oppressor and Palestinians the oppressed; that the relative position is the moral factor. That the point of comparison for "calling for the death of Jews" now isn't "calling for the death of Jews" then, but "calling for the death of Nazis" then, because both are calling for violence against "the oppressor" in the name of defending "the oppressed." (I did once, back in college, have a conversation with someone whose position on death camps and genocide was "no bad tactics, only bad targets," and that whether such things are immoral — or not — depends entirely on who is using them against whom and whether or not the latter group "deserves it.")

I don't agree with this view and its "more oppressed than thou" hierarchy, but at can, at least sometimes, be a consistent one.

I did once, back in college, have a conversation with someone whose position on death camps and genocide was "no bad tactics, only bad targets," and that whether such things are immoral — or not — depends entirely on who is using them against whom and whether or not the latter group "deserves it."

Out of morbid curiosity, who, in this someone’s mind, “deserves it”?

who, in this someone’s mind, “deserves it”?

In short? Right wingers.