site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 13, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hlynka has been on this for a while, it’s a strange but not entirely unforeseen twist. Since he rejects wignatism and gets occasionally made fun of even by more moderate conservatives here for rejecting HBD and some ideas common on the new/dissident right for a colorblind, middle-American form of Christianity, he had some kind of mind break and has now cast ‘Jewish professors’ as a kind of enemy class. Since Jews are very overrepresented on the dissident right, for Hlynka the entire dissident right is a Jewish movement (presumably BAP, who does literally have a Yale political science PhD, counts as one of these Jews).

Ironically this particular kind of antisemitism is fundamentally Marxist (even though he replaces the economic motive with the social one); like Marx, to Hlynka these Jews aren’t defined by their race or even religion, it’s a strange cultural designation, it’s ‘New York’, it’s ‘cultural Marxism’ maybe (which he considers identical to the dissident right ideology), I’m not sure. What should be done about ‘Jewish poli sci professors’ remains to be seen in his view.

to Hlynka these Jews aren’t defined by their race or even religion, it’s a strange cultural designation,

It's only "strange" if you continue to insist that culture doesn't matter.

A big chunk of the disagreement here is that I continue to maintain that culture not only matters, but matters a great deal.

What exactly is a Jew if they're not defined by being descended from a Jewish parent/mother nor being of Judaistic confession, then?

The obvious counter is to ask whether can anyone be properly considered "a Jew" without believing in God or keeping the Sabbath?

Mean while I'd say the answer to your question is simple, it's Culture.

So the answer is "whoever I say"?

No, the answer is culture.