site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 13, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

OpenAI announces leadership transition

The board of directors of OpenAI, Inc., the 501(c)(3) that acts as the overall governing body for all OpenAI activities, today announced that Sam Altman will depart as CEO and leave the board of directors. Mira Murati, the company’s chief technology officer, will serve as interim CEO, effective immediately.

A member of OpenAI’s leadership team for five years, Mira has played a critical role in OpenAI’s evolution into a global AI leader. She brings a unique skill set, understanding of the company’s values, operations, and business, and already leads the company’s research, product, and safety functions. Given her long tenure and close engagement with all aspects of the company, including her experience in AI governance and policy, the board believes she is uniquely qualified for the role and anticipates a seamless transition while it conducts a formal search for a permanent CEO.

Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities. The board no longer has confidence in his ability to continue leading OpenAI.

In a statement, the board of directors said: “OpenAI was deliberately structured to advance our mission: to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all humanity. The board remains fully committed to serving this mission. We are grateful for Sam’s many contributions to the founding and growth of OpenAI. At the same time, we believe new leadership is necessary as we move forward. As the leader of the company’s research, product, and safety functions, Mira is exceptionally qualified to step into the role of interim CEO. We have the utmost confidence in her ability to lead OpenAI during this transition period.”

I posted this in Twitter and someone speculated that it's because Altman paused subscriptions on Tuesday, but that would alone seem like a pretty inconsequential reason for this sort of a major move.

One hypothesis is that it's due to the allegations of sexual abuse from his sister. But she made them a relative aeon ago, they didn't gain traction, and this isn't the kind of departure you'd see from that. Plus, another employee/board member was removed.

My guess is fraud or IP theft.

The allegations sounded like bullshit to me, she's quite fucked in the head, an equivalent of a fail-daughter. IIRC, she alleged that Sam would "enter her bed" when they were kids, and later down the line, when she messed up her life and began doing sex work, she turned down offers of financial assistance or even a home from him and their mom, and then went on to blame him for cutting off her finances.

I think accusations of childhood abuse of this ilk are fraught in the first place, doubly so when Sam is out and proud gay.

I have no idea if the allegations are accurate, but one can argue that her turning down offers of financial assistance and a home from him and their mom actually makes them more credible. One possible reason to refuse help is that the people offering it disgust you and you do not want to ever feel obligated to them in any way.

Here's a discussion about the allegations from a sympathetic source. At the time of reading it, and currently, I think it's far more likely that it's all the confabulation of a deeply disturbed individual rather than anything credible.

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/QDczBduZorG4dxZiW/sam-altman-s-sister-annie-altman-claims-sam-has-severely

(Jokingly) "{Sam's 'nuclear backpack'} may also hold our Dad and Grandma’s trusts {which} him {Sam} and my birth mother are still withholding from me, knowing I started sex work for survival because of being sick and broke with a millionaire “brother”"

And

Note: when Annie says "go no contact", she's referring to the decision she made to refuse Sam Altman's offer to buy her a house (an offer which she Annie feels was not borne of graciousness but rather as a desire to exact greater control over and suppression of Annie (who had begun to speak out against Sam on the Internet)) and thus avoid contact with her family, a decision she upheld even when (according to her) she was dealing with extreme sickness, mental illness / anguish, shadowbanning, and poverty.

On the topic of shadowbanning:

"{I experienced} Shadowbanning across all platforms except onlyfans and pornhub. Also had 6 months of hacking into almost all my accounts and wifi when I first started the podcast"

Bruh

Altman might be a well-connected millionaire geek, but I think it's far more likely that a person with known mental illnesses claiming he's been fucking with her wifi for ages is probably just delusional. At least until we have proof that he unleashed their internal AGI or something stupid along those lines.

I agree, it sounds like schizophrenia-type delusions of persecution. Her turning down financial assistance is still odd though, but I am not sure to what extent mental illnesses affect people's ability to make those kinds of "you should obviously almost certainly take the money" decisions.

Her reading of the intentions behind offering her financial assistance/housing may still be correct; from the family's side this would just be "we'll buy her a house so we can keep tabs and make her go and get a proper career rather than whoring herself out online", which she might find unacceptably intrusive. Compare to anecdotes about homeless people who would rather risk dying of exposure than accept a shelter spot because the shelters are intolerant of drug consumption. I've also heard from Asian-American acquaintances whose life plans were too messy/unstable for their parents' liking that the parents would start pestering them with offers of buying them a house or apartment near where they (the parents) live and/or setting them up with a desk job at some company/office run by family friends, which said acquaintances would read as a transparent bid for greater control calculated to catch them in a moment of weakness.

A lot? That's certainly my opinion on it, even if I struggle to dig up concrete evidence, I doubt anyone's done a study on the topic.