This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This story just sounds like the 20th century version of all the usual “inhuman bugs blah blah they don’t help strangers blah blah they run over crash victims so they don’t have to pay their healthcare costs blah blah watch a coworker jump off a building and just keep working etc etc” propaganda.
In reality, I’ve never seen a shred of genuine evidence to suggest that Han value human life less than Europeans in a way that transcends material conditions. For every cruelty or inhumanity alleged there would seem to be an analogue in the histories of other peoples.
Feet bending and FGM (en masse and not as a punishment) seems to be unique in their respective places though
FGM is more widespread than unique; it at least dates back to Egypt in classical times, and today extends from sub-Saharan through North Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. It seems to have been a cultural practice in Northeast Africa that predated Islam and was adopted by it before it made its way around the world. (Not many sources on its spread, unsurprisingly; I'd be very curious to learn why Indonesia adopted it with a lot more enthusiasm than other countries between it and its origin.)
Footbinding is genuinely unique. Even calling it Chinese is slightly overbroad, as it was a mostly Han practice.
ETA: thinking about it a bit, footbinding can only exist as a widespread cultural practice in places where either 1) there is a sufficient surplus of resources that you can write off a part of the population from contributing to economic activity or 2) technology has developed enough such that there's valuable economic activity that can be performed while sitting. China was optimally positioned for both compared to most regions around the world. FGM, by contrast, seems like it would have minimal economic effect, so different cultures could adopt it more readily.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link