Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 68
- 2
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What’s your favorite history podcast/YouTube channel? I’ve tried Dan Carlin but honestly just don’t like him for some reason.
Obviously looking for well sourced high quality content, as well as someone who isn’t super left biased.
I really like Robin Pierson's The History of Byzantium podcast. It's very well researched and he interviews academics who study Byzantium and even has a few episodes where he goes through a recent academic paper to cover current developments in the field. It's not dry at all though, Robin is a good story teller. Like many podcasts I think he's gotten stronger as he's gone a long, so if you want a taste of it to decide if it's for you I recommend starting with the episodes on the Fourth Crusade (numbers 259 & 260). If you enjoy those then you can go back and start from the beginning.
The Age of Napoleon is another good one. It covers the French Revolution at a high level but the focus is on what Napoleon personally saw and did so it would be helpful (but not necessary) to read a few wiki articles if you aren't already familiar with the time period. If you want a preview his episode on the life of Admiral Nelson is self contained and very good. When talking about the different factions he usually just describes their views without endorsing or condemning them, on either the left or the right.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link