site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 8, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

RIP Coach Red Pill. Whatever you were in your life, now you are symbol and martyr

No, he's not, he's an object lesson in why you don't go to a corrupt shithole under military rule by Nazis and start advocating for the country they're in a state of total war with.

If I went to Ukraine(which doesn't seem like a great idea to me, but IDK maybe I decided to get a mail order bride or something), I would keep my opinion that Crimea is part of Russia because it voted for annexation to myself in the interest of not getting murdered or imprisoned.

Reports:

Redacted: Calling the Ukrainian government Nazis is a very inflammatory claim, with no justification provided Redacted: antagonistic

While this isn't antagonistic enough for me to care, it does seem a bit excessive to call the Ukrainian government Nazis.

Hyperbole? Well, that's okay, to a degree, and I think it's evident that you're implying they're authoritarian rather than literal card-carrying National Socialists. The rules regarding providing justification for one's claims are not meant to be taken quite that literally as far as I'm concerned, even if this is a subpar phrasing. You do acknowledge they're corrupt (a subjective standard, but true enough, even if less than they used to be), and that there are restrictions on speech and political affiliation because they are, in fact, in a state of Total War. I suggest the people who reported you read between a lines a tad bit more, even if you exaggerate.

Anyway, I deem this comment only mildly inflammatory, within the bounds of what I'm willing to tolerate, but I would prefer you try and be a little more polite and less pejorative in your phrasing. This isn't a warning, more of a tut-tut.

Sigh. One day the mods will be freed from accusations that we are biased in favor of Liberals/Ukraine/The Jews/Rightists and other mutually contradictory groups, but not today.

No, he's not, he's an object lesson in why you don't go to a corrupt shithole under military rule by Nazis and start advocating for the country they're in a state of total war with.

Nazis? Do you believe that Zelensky is a Pythonesque Jewish Nazi or are you using the Russian government's definition of Nazi?

No, he's not,

For you and most of us here, or Soldo. For plenty of others that might be true. People swalloved Ghost of Kyiv and Sam Hyde as Ghost of Kyiv..

Being stupid, putting oneself at risk, being naive all seem like things that are more likely to make someone a martyr. I think he won't become a martyr because regime media in the west will simply ignore it. Or at best right wing media will cover it while regime media ignores it so it becomes a polarizing culture war issue, he'll be an Ashli Babbitt basically.