This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I think this part of it. Unreported crime is not part of the stats.
I agree. This is why store detectives are trained to screen for everyone, not just single out people who fit a certain stereotype of a shoplifter. Yes, teens may be more likely to shoplift overall, but plenty of older people, even people in suits do to. I think the Nordic incarceration 'miracle' is somewhat oversold and I think ignores factors such as unreported crime, or other factors. I am really skeptical.
Yup, these European countries have surprisingly high levels of crime, [https://imgur.com/SnwgD83] which runs against a popular media narrative that those countries have superior criminal justice systems. Of course, some of this may be due to immigration, and crime stats may not delineate between native populations and immigrants or second generation immigrants. Pickpockets have been a problem in Europe forever.
As I said in the past here on a thread here a 3 weeks ago, I think long prison sentences are an effective deterrent against most crimes (except possibly impulsive crimes), particularly white collar and organized crime. The Five Families, from its peak of power in the early 80s, in the span of a decade dissolved by the early 90s, in large part due to huge sentencing guidelines...sentences were so long that everyone ratted on each other, bosses were sent away for life, and the crime network collapsed. Certainty of punishment matters too, if having to choose between longer sentences vs. certainty, but if sentences are too lenient than instead of being an effective deterrent it becomes a cost of doing business, which you don't want if crime prevention is your objective. This is why some major Mafia families avoided dealing with drugs, because the risk of prison was so high that it wasn't worth it.
Mafia families are very much a specific set of crime, that was crime as a business. That’s a very small percentage of a criminal population. Chicago’s murder issues are not protecting some profitable business. And those people are the types who fail the marshmallow test. So long sentence do less to prevent crime. And a broken windows theory works better.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link